Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
TATA (U) Ltd v Neem Cosmetics Ltd (Civil Suit No: 0766 of 2019) [2025] UGCommC 217 (19 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed this commercial suit after neither party appeared at the hearing, relying on Order 17 rule 4 of Uganda's Civil Procedure Rules.
Western Cables Uganda Limited v Juliet Namuli Asiya and Others (Civil Suit No: 522 of 2019) [2025] UGCommC 205 (19 June 2025)
The court dismissed this commercial suit for want of prosecution after neither side appeared at the hearing, applying Order 17 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Apurinari Reagan v Green World International (U) Ltd and Isaac Ren (Civil Suit No: 717 of 2019) [2025] UGCommC 206 (19 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed a breach of contract suit after neither party attended the hearing, applying Order 17 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Exim Bank Uganda Ltd v Benon Tumusange and Timothy Justine Robert Mayhew (Civil Suit No: 921 of 2016) [2025] UGCommC 204 (19 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed a commercial suit after neither party appeared for the hearing, applying Order 17 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Nashat Abdul Rahim M. Asad v Mwesigwa Joseph (Civil Suit No: 947 of 2019) [2025] UGHC 520 (19 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed this civil suit after neither party appeared at the hearing, relying on Order 17 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Arch Design Limited v Walusimbi Garage Limited (Civil Suit No: 32 of 2019) [2025] UGCommC 209 (18 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed a commercial suit after both parties failed to appear at hearing, relying on Order 17 rule 4 and emphasizing case backlog management.
Dr. Ongaba Ernest Harry v Mediterranian Shipping S.A Geneva and Kenfreight (U) Ltd (Civil Suit No: 293 of 2011) [2025] UGCommC 207 (18 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed the suit after neither party appeared for hearing, relying on Order 17 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the need to manage delay.
Kironde Ashiraf v Kobil Uganda Ltd (Civil Suit No: 381 of 2016) [2025] UGCommC 208 (18 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed a civil suit after neither party appeared for hearing, relying on Order 17 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules and case-management concerns.
Kampala Capital City Authority v Kampala District Land Board and 4 Others (Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 332 of 2019) [2021] UGHCLD 30 (21 January 2021)
The High Court set aside a dismissal order, reinstated the suit, and ordered the applicant to pay UGX 30 million security for costs. Each party bore its own costs.
