Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Uganda Revenue Authority v Roche Transport & Logistics Uganda Limited (Miscellaneous Application 2926 of 2023) [2024] UGCommC 60 (23 January 2024)
The High Court granted a conditional stay of execution pending appeal, requiring the Uganda Revenue Authority to pay 70% of the collected sum as security.
Zenagalia v Sari Consult Limited and Others (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 91 of 2020) [2021] UGIC 112 (5 March 2021)
The Industrial Court granted security for a possible decree, finding the respondent had not shown adequate assets in Uganda to satisfy judgment in the labour dispute.
Zenagalia v Sari Consulting Limited and 2 Others (Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 91 of 2020) [2021] UGIC 32 (3 March 2021)
The Industrial Court granted security for a potential decree, finding the respondent had not shown sufficient assets in Uganda and ordered a UGX 500 million bank guarantee.
Nkoba v Traminco (U) Limited and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 668 of 2019) [2020] UGCommC 162 (22 December 2020)
The High Court declined to vary a registrar’s order requiring security, but restrained payment of UGX 950 million to protect the applicant’s position pending further orders.
Uganda National Roads Authority v. DOTT Services Ltd (Miscellaneous Application No. 798 of 2017) [2017] UGCommC 205 (21 December 2017)
The High Court declined to order deposit of UGX 7.89 billion into court, finding no sufficient basis to stop payment and dismissing the application with costs.
Coil Limited v Transtrade Services Limited (MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION No. 0014 OF 2016) [2016] UGHCCD 93 (10 December 2016)
The High Court at Arua refused attachment before judgment, finding no real risk of asset dissipation, inadequate disclosure, and no basis for security.
Salini Construction S.P.A v Bisons Consult International (HCT-00-MA 88 of 2008) [2009] UGCommC 44 (23 February 2009)
The High Court refused to review a consent order and declined to unfreeze a bank account, holding that the applicant had not shown valid grounds for interference.
Gulbanu and Another v Singh (Civil Suit No. 16 of 1955) [1955] EACA 13 (1 January 1955)
Stay pending appeal granted on conditions: payment into court or security, with costs and interest to be dealt with under the court’s directions.
