Rwabuhoro v zubairi Mukasa and 2 Others (Civil Application No. 165 of 2018) [2022] UGCA 72 (10 March 2022)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Civil Application No. 165 of 2018
Judge
Musota, JA, Bamugemereire, JA, Musoke, JA
The Court of Appeal refused to strike out a notice of appeal, holding that counsel’s negligence in failing to file the memorandum should not be visited on the clients.
Media Council of Tanzania and Others v Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania (Application 5 of 2019) [2020] EACJ 40 (9 June 2020) (Appellate Division)
Court
East African Court of Justice
Case number
Application 5 of 2019
Judge
Kiryabwire JA, Mjasiri JA, Ugirashebuja P
The Appellate Division struck out the Notice of Appeal because the respondent failed to institute the appeal within 30 days as required by the EACJ Rules.
Managing Editor Mseto and Another v Attorney General, Republic of Tanzania (Application 3 of 2019; Application 4 of 2019) [2020] EACJ 7 (2 June 2020) (Appellate Division)
Court
East African Court of Justice
Case number
Application 3 of 2019 ; Application 4 of 2019
Judge
Kiryabwire JA, Mjasiri JA, Nkurunziza VP, Ringera JA, Ugirashebuja P
The Court found that the Respondent failed to provide sufficient reason for the delay in filing the appeal. The restructuring of the Attorney General's office, cited as the cause, occurred months before the judgment and did not prevent the timely filing of the Notice of Appeal, nor did it preclude the filing of the appeal itself. The Respondent demonstrated capacity to file documents during the relevant period, and no directive prohibited the Attorney General's office from filing the appeal. The application for extension of time was filed over a year after the Notice of Appeal, evidencing dil…
Byeitima & 2 Ors Vs Asaba (Civil Application No.264 of 2013) [2015] UGCA 86 (23 October 2015)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Civil Application No.264 of 2013
The Court of Appeal refused to strike out a notice of appeal, holding that Christmas vacation time should be excluded and that the appeal should be heard on its merits.
Bahinguza & Anor v Attorney General (Miscellaneous Application No. 269 of 2013) [2015] UGCA 5 (20 January 2015)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Miscellaneous Application No. 269 of 2013
The respondent failed to take an essential step in prosecuting the intended appeal by not filing the Memorandum and Record of Appeal within the prescribed sixty-day period after receiving notice that the court proceedings were ready for collection. The court found that service of the Registrar's letter was legally effective, as the Attorney General's Chambers received and acted upon it. The respondent's explanations regarding internal file movements and the status of the staff who received the letter were rejected, as they amounted to attempts to benefit from their own procedural lapses. Give…
Utex Industries Ltd v Attorney General (Civil Application No. 52 of 1995) [1995] UGSC 38 (4 August 1995)
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Case number
Civil Application No. 52 of 1995
Judge
Oder, JSC, J.W.N.Tsekooko, JSC, Karokora, JSC
The Supreme Court struck out the Attorney General’s notice of appeal for failing to comply with mandatory appeal steps and time limits under the Supreme Court Rules.
Hannington Wasswa Semukutu and Company v Onyango and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application 12 of 1988) [1989] UGSC 6 (7 July 1989)
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Case number
Miscellaneous Application 12 of 1988
Judge
Manyindo, DCJ, Odoki, JSC, Platt, JSC
The Supreme Court of Uganda struck out a notice of appeal as out of time, holding that proceedings were ready on 22 August 1988 and the appeal was not filed within the prescribed period.