Chelimo v Chemayi (Revision Cause No. 4 of 2020)
Chelimo v Chemayi (Revision Cause No. 4 of 2020) [2021] UGHCCD 184 (12 October 2021)
The High Court held that the trial Magistrate did not act outside his jurisdiction or with material irregularity by using a GPS to determine the acreage of the suit land during the locus visit. The court found that GPS is a modern and acceptable tool for land measurement, and there was no evidence that the Magistrate lacked competence to use it. The official survey report on record, commissioned by the court, implemented the judgment and demarcated the decreed 73.2 acres. The applicant's grievance regarding the acreage and the use of GPS does not fall within the scope of revision under Sectio…
Source excerpt
- Revision Jurisdiction
- Execution Of Decrees
- Land Ownership Disputes
- Survey Evidence
- Magistrate Powers