Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Manji v I & M Bank Uganda Limited & Another (Miscellaneous Application 170 of 2024) [2024] UGCommC 85 (16 February 2024)
The High Court struck out an application to extend time for a loan-payment condition attached to a temporary injunction, holding the injunction had already lapsed.
Great Lakes Energy Company NV v MSS XSABO Power Limited and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application 1041 of 2023) [2023] UGCommC 28 (18 August 2023)
The High Court varied an interim preservation order in an LCIA-related dispute, keeping it in force until the final award becomes enforceable as a court decree.
Kasinzi alias Gatsinzi v Kisiki and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 2067 of 2022) [2023] UGHCLD 75 (29 March 2023)
The court found that the applicant was notified of the conditional stay order on 29th November 2022, and the 30-day period for payment of the security deposit began from that date. The amount ordered (UGX 20,000,000) was reasonable and proportionate given the value of the suit land and costs. The applicant failed to demonstrate financial incapacity or seriousness in complying with the order, as he did not deposit any part of the sum or take steps to prosecute his appeal. The court held that it could not use its discretionary powers to effectively review or appeal its own conditional order, an…
Source excerpt
Florence Tibayungwa v Dusabe Mary (Miscellaneous Application No. 1939 of 2013) [2015] UGHCEBD 5 (20 February 2015)
The High Court set aside a purported consent settlement, holding that no true consent had been reached and that the Registrar lacked power to vary the decree.
Comesa Technologies (U) Ltd v Mushabe (Civil Appeal No. 1906 of 2013) [2014] UGHCEBD 2 (24 March 2014)
The High Court held that a registrar could not vary a consent order absent default, set aside the review order, and found the bailiff breached payment directions.
Comesa Technology (U) Limited v David G. Mushabe (Civil Appeal No. 1906 of 2013) [2014] UGHCEBD 7 (24 March 2014)
The High Court held that a Registrar could not vary a consent order on execution, set aside the review order, and confirmed the payment as valid settlement within time.
Kiika v Coffee Marketing Board (Civil Suit 395 of 1988) [1992] UGHC 57 (26 November 1992)
The High Court varied an earlier order so infant beneficiaries’ funds would be paid to their grandfather, subject to bank deposit and court supervision.
