Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kamanzi v Director of CID and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Cause 41 of 2023) [2024] UGHC 552 (28 June 2024)
The High Court struck out invalid respondent affidavits but dismissed this judicial review application as time-barred, holding that time ran from the DPP’s sanctioning of charges.
Victoria Equipment Limited v National Animal Genetic Resources Centre and Data Bank (Application 17 of 2024) [2024] UGPPDPAAT 28 (29 April 2024)
The Tribunal struck out Victoria Equipment Limited’s procurement review application as time barred and vacated the suspension order, declining to reach the merits.
Kasaija and 254 Others v Kabakumba and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application 164 of 2022) [2023] UGHC 163 (22 December 2023)
The High Court at Masindi dismissed an application for leave to amend a counterclaim, finding it time-barred and potentially prejudicial to the respondents.
Obol and Others v Gulu University and Another (Miscellaneous Cause No. 16 of 2021) [2023] UGHC 40 (17 March 2023)
The court held that the three-month limitation period for filing judicial review applications under section 36(7) of the Judicature Act and Rule 5(1) of the Judicial Review Rules is mandatory and not merely directory. The applicants' challenge to the promotion and appointment of the second respondent was filed several years after the relevant decisions, far outside the statutory period. The court found that statutes of limitation are matters of substantive law, not technicalities, and must be strictly complied with. The applicants did not formally apply for extension of time or plead exceptio…
Source excerpt
Chris Tushabe V The Electoral Commission & 4 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 0089 of 2008) [2009] UGHC 243 (30 January 2009)
The High Court overruled preliminary objections to a judicial review application, finding it was not time-barred, not premature, and not a representative suit.
