Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Public International Law [1990] ACHPR 6

Eugene v USA and Anor (Communication 37 of 1990)

Eugene v USA and Anor (Communication 37 of 1990) [1990] ACHPR 6 (28 April 1990)

The African Commission declared a communication inadmissible because it was directed against states not party to the African Charter.

  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • Jurisdiction Of Commission
  • State Party Requirement
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • Jurisdiction
  • State-party-requirement
Read case analysis
Public International Law [1990] ACHPR 5

Houver v Morocco (Communication 41 of 1990)

Houver v Morocco (Communication 41 of 1990) [1990] ACHPR 5 (28 April 1990)

The African Commission held that Andre Houver’s communication against Morocco was inadmissible because Morocco was not a party to the African Charter.

  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • State Party Requirement
  • African Charter On Human And Peoples Rights
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • State-party-requirement
  • African-charter-on-human-and-peoples-rights
Read case analysis
Public International Law [1989] ACHPR 7

Centre Haitien des Libertes Publiques v Ethiopia (Communication 21 of 1988)

Centre Haitien des Libertes Publiques v Ethiopia (Communication 21 of 1988) [1989] ACHPR 7 (4 November 1989)

The African Commission held a communication against Ethiopia inadmissible because Ethiopia was not a party to the African Charter at the material time.

  • African Charter On Human And Peoples Rights
  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • State Party Requirement
  • African-charter-on-human-and-peoples-rights
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • State-party-requirement
Read case analysis
Public International Law [1989] ACHPR 5

Association Internationale Des Jurists Democrates v Ethiopia (Communication 28 of 1989)

Association Internationale Des Jurists Democrates v Ethiopia (Communication 28 of 1989) [1989] ACHPR 5 (4 November 1989)

The African Commission declared inadmissible a communication against Ethiopia because Ethiopia was not a party to the African Charter.

  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • Jurisdiction Of Commission
  • State Party Requirement
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • Jurisdiction-of-commission
  • State-party-requirement
Read case analysis
Public International Law [1989] ACHPR 4

Austrian Committee Against Torture v Morocco (Communication 20 of 1988)

Austrian Committee Against Torture v Morocco (Communication 20 of 1988) [1989] ACHPR 4 (4 November 1989)

The African Commission found a communication inadmissible because it was brought against Morocco, which was not a party to the African Charter.

  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • State Party Requirement
  • Human Rights Charter
  • Jurisdiction Of Commission
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • State-party-requirement
Read case analysis
Public International Law [1989] ACHPR 8

International PEN v Malawi and Others (Communication 19 of 1988)

International PEN v Malawi and Others (Communication 19 of 1988) [1989] ACHPR 8 (4 November 1989)

The African Commission declared International PEN’s communication inadmissible because it was directed against states that were not parties to the Charter.

  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • Jurisdiction Of Commission
  • State Party Requirement
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • Jurisdiction
  • State-party-requirement
Read case analysis
Public International Law [1989] ACHPR 6

Commission Francaise Justice et Paix v Ethiopia (Communication 29 of 1989)

Commission Francaise Justice et Paix v Ethiopia (Communication 29 of 1989) [1989] ACHPR 6 (4 November 1989)

The African Commission held a communication inadmissible because it was directed against Ethiopia, a State not party to the African Charter.

  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • State Party Requirement
  • Right To Life
  • African Charter On Human And Peoples Rights
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • State-party-requirement
Read case analysis
Public International Law [1989] ACHPR 2

Union National De Liberation De Cabinda v Angola (Communication 24 of 1989)

Union National De Liberation De Cabinda v Angola (Communication 24 of 1989) [1989] ACHPR 2 (14 April 1989)

The African Commission declared inadmissible a communication by the Union National De Liberation de Cabinda against Angola because Angola was not a party to the Charter.

  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • State Party Requirement
  • Self Determination
  • Jurisdiction Of Commission
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • State-party-requirement
Read case analysis
Public International Law [1988] ACHPR 6

Sanussi v Ethiopia (Communication 14 of 1988)

Sanussi v Ethiopia (Communication 14 of 1988) [1988] ACHPR 6 (26 October 1988)

The African Commission declared a communication inadmissible because it was brought against a state that was not a party to the African Charter.

  • African Charter On Human And Peoples Rights
  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • State Party Requirement
  • African-charter-on-human-and-peoples-rights
  • Admissibility
  • Communications
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1988] ACHPR 2

Abebe v Ethiopia (Communication 10 of 1988)

Abebe v Ethiopia (Communication 10 of 1988) [1988] ACHPR 2 (26 October 1988)

The African Commission held that the communication was inadmissible because it was directed against a State not party to the African Charter.

  • Admissibility Of Communications
  • Jurisdiction Of Commission
  • State Party Requirement
  • Admissibility-of-communications
  • Jurisdiction-of-commission
  • State-party-requirement
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.