Share
Sanussi v Ethiopia (Communication 14 of 1988) [1988] ACHPR 6 (26 October 1988)
- Citation
- [1988] ACHPR 6
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
- Posture
- Communication / Admissibility
- Case number
- Communication 14 of 1988
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
- Posture
- Communication / Admissibility
- Case number
- Communication 14 of 1988
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights determined that it lacks jurisdiction to consider communications against States that are not parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Since Ethiopia is not a party to the Charter, the communication is inadmissible under Article 56 of the Charter and Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure. The Commission therefore declared the communication inadmissible without considering the merits.
Court disposition
communication declared inadmissible
Orders
- The communication is declared inadmissible.
02
Material facts
Parties
Dr. Abd Eldayem A. E. Sanussi
ApplicantEthiopia
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Communication / Admissibility
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the communication is admissible against a State that is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant submitted a communication alleging arbitrary detention by the respondent State, seeking redress under the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
- Respondent
- The respondent State did not submit arguments, as it is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Article 56 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights; Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure
A communication is inadmissible if directed against a State that is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights determined that it lacks jurisdiction to consider communications against States that are not parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Since Ethiopia is not a party to the Charter, the communication is inadmissible under Article 56 of the Charter and Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure. The Commission therefore declared the communication inadmissible without considering the merits.
Court disposition
communication declared inadmissible
- The communication is declared inadmissible.
Source and reliance status
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Judgment
17-26 October 1988 Communication No. 14/88
AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS Fourth Ordinary Session 17-26 October 1988
DR. ABD ELDAYEM A. E. SANUSSI v. ETHIOPIA
DECISION
[Citation: Sanussi v. Eth.](http://www.worldcourts.com/achpr/eng/decisions/1988.10_Abd_Eldayem_Sanussi_v_Ethiopia.htm), Comm. 14/88, 7th ACHPR AAR Annex IX (1993-1994) Publications: IHRDA, Compilation of Decisions on Communications of the African Commission On Human and Peoples' Rights Extracted from the Commission's Activity Reports 1994-2001, at 96 (2002); Documents of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, at 340 (Malcolm D. Evans & Rachel Murray eds., 2001)
COMMUNICATION ABOUT ARBITRARY DETENTION, DATED FEBRUARY 29, 1988
[1] "The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, established under Article 30 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights;
[2] Meeting at its fourth ordinary session from 17 to 26 October 1988;
[3] Considering that the communication is directed against a State which is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights;
[4] Declares the communication inadmissible" (Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure, Article 56 of the Charter).
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.