Kiggundu and Others v Ndagano
Kiggundu and Others v Ndagano (MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.3538 OF 2023) [2025] UGHC 164 (31 January 2025)
The court found that the Respondent had two written statements of defence on record, filed through different advocates. The application to strike out the defence and enter judgment was only served on one set of advocates (M/s CCAKS Advocates) and not on M/s Mukiibi Kyeyune Advocates, who also represented the Respondent and filed a defence. In light of the constitutional right to a fair hearing and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, the court held that it would be improper to proceed without ensuring service on all legal representatives. The application was therefore stayed, and the Applica…
Source excerpt
- Striking Out Defence
- Judgment On Admission
- Specific Denial Requirements
- Service Of Process
- Multiplicity Of Proceedings