Jamada v Hardscreen Logistics Limited & 2 Others
Jamada v Hardscreen Logistics Limited & 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application 345 of 2024) [2024] UGCommC 151 (3 May 2024)
The court held that the applicant failed to properly commence an appeal as required by Order 50 Rule 8, which mandates that appeals from registrar's orders be by motion on notice, not by notice of appeal. Furthermore, the purported appeal was filed out of time, with no evidence of a timely request for certified copies to justify exclusion of time under Section 79(2) of the Civil Procedure Act. The applicant also failed to provide any good cause for the delay or to seek an extension of time. Additionally, the applicant did not comply with the court's order to deposit 30% security as required u…
Source excerpt
- Stay Of Execution
- Appeals Procedure
- Registrar Orders
- Mortgage Regulation Compliance