Serunjogi v Ntege (Miscellaneous Application 189 of 2024) [2025] UGHC 290 (5 May 2025)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Miscellaneous Application 189 of 2024
Judge
Deepa Verma, J
The High Court struck out a respondent’s appeal papers as defective after finding they were neither signed nor sealed, and granted costs to the applicant.
Hoza Auto (U) Ltd v Dr. Asaba George (Civil Miscellaneous Application 14 of 2024) [2025] UGHC 406 (10 March 2025)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Civil Miscellaneous Application 14 of 2024
Judge
David S.L. Makumbi, J
The High Court at Kasese dismissed an application to amend a plaint and join a proposed second defendant, holding the plaintiff could not be forced to sue a third party in this tort claim.
Mandella Millers Limited v Dembe Enterprises Limited & Another (Trademark Registration 29770 of 2021) [2024] UGRSB 16 (17 July 2024)
Court
Uganda Registration Services Bureau
Case number
Trademark Registration 29770 of 2021
Judge
Birungi Denis - Senior Registration Officer
The Applicant established that it is an aggrieved party, having been prevented from registering its own 'SUPREME' trademarks due to the Respondent's mark. The Applicant provided credible evidence of non-use by the Respondent for a continuous period of three years and one month prior to the application, shifting the burden to the Respondent to prove bona fide use. The Respondent failed to discharge this burden, as it did not file a statutory declaration or sufficient evidence of use within the relevant period. The assignment to the Third party was only in respect of rice, but the Office errone…
Butaleeba v Buuzabalyawo (Civil Miscellaneous Application 59 of 2024) [2024] UGHC 690 (23 May 2024)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Civil Miscellaneous Application 59 of 2024
Judge
Oyuko Anthony Ojok, J
The court found that the applicant failed to prove sufficient cause for his non-appearance on 16th October, 2023. The explanation of mishearing the date was unsupported by any medical evidence or documentation, and the applicant did not take reasonable steps to confirm the hearing date with the court clerk. The reasons advanced regarding counsel's office closure and ill health were not substantiated with adequate details or documentation. The applicant's failure to file required documents and witness statements, despite repeated court directives, demonstrated a lack of vigilance and complianc…
The Tribunal dismissed an application to extend time for a tax review, finding the applicant gave no reasonable excuse for missing the statutory deadline.
The Tax Appeals Tribunal granted Farola Supplies Limited leave to file its tax review application out of time, accepting that counsel’s failure should not be visited on the company.
The Tribunal dismissed an application to extend time for filing a tax review, finding that service of the objection decision was valid and the nearly four-year delay was unjustified.