Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Okello Newton and Others v Angia Ogola (Civil Appeal 16 of 2018) [2025] UGHC 382 (4 June 2025)
The High Court partly allowed a land appeal, setting aside orders over the whole suit land and protecting only the portion proved by the respondent.
Wanenge S/o Musiiho and Another v Fagayo Eridadi Yosuwa (Civil Appeal No. 007 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 424 (30 May 2025)
The High Court allowed a land appeal, holding that the respondent’s trial evidence departed from the pleadings, so ownership was not proved on the balance of probabilities.
Uwamahoro v Senyonyi (Miscellaneous Application 538 of 2022) [2025] UGHCCD 22 (14 February 2025)
The High Court struck out a plaint for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action, finding the pleadings and annexures did not support the claimed liability.
Muhangi & Another v Ssekubwa (Civil Appeal 42 of 2022) [2025] UGHCCD 1 (2 January 2025)
The High Court allowed a civil appeal, set aside an order releasing a disputed vehicle, and held the appellants’ custody was lawful as estate administrators.
Namatovu v Bukenya (Miscellaneous Application 2870 of 2024) [2024] UGHCLD 291 (9 December 2024)
The High Court declined to strike out a plaint alleging blocked access to kibanja land, holding that the cause of action issue needed evidence at trial.
Kasegu and 6 Others v Kazimura (Civil Appeal 86 of 2022) [2024] UGHC 1164 (8 November 2024)
High Court appeal over a land trespass dispute allowed after finding the trial court misread the evidence and the respondent failed to prove ownership.
Sanyu v China Railway Group & Another (Civil Suit 11 of 2024) [2024] UGHC 1063 (22 October 2024)
The court held that the Plaintiff sued a non-existent entity by naming 'China Railway Group' as the 1st Defendant, when the actual contracting party was 'China Railway No. 3 Engineering Group Ltd.' The Plaintiff failed to establish the legal personality of the 1st Defendant as named, and did not seek to amend the plaint to correct the misnomer. As a result, the suit against the 1st Defendant was a nullity. Regarding the 2nd Defendant, the plaint failed to disclose any facts or annexes establishing a cause of action, as required by law. The only reference to the 2nd Defendant was the existence…
Source excerpt
Dyingoma v Citibank (in liquidation) (MISCtrLLANEOUS CAUSE NO. OII OF 2024) [2024] UGHC 1220 (30 September 2024)
The High Court ordered release of a discharged mortgage title to the purchaser after finding he had paid the balance, but refused an unpleaded vesting order.
Amondoi v Oryon (Civil Appeal 57 of 2023) [2024] UGHC 797 (27 August 2024)
The High Court dismissed a defamation appeal, holding the plaint failed to plead the actual defamatory words verbatim and so disclosed no cause of action.
Mubangizi v Gumisa and 19 Others (HCT-01-LD-CS 21 of 2019) [2024] UGHC 708 (12 July 2024)
The High Court dismissed an ex parte land suit after finding the plaintiff departed from his pleadings and failed to prove ownership on a balance of probabilities.
