Anslem Semakula v Anna Nabatanzi and Others
Anslem Semakula v Anna Nabatanzi and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 9 of 2025) [2025] UGHC 450 (24 June 2025)
The court found that although the applicant had filed an appeal against the judgment in HCCS. No. 94 of 2010, he failed to demonstrate any real or imminent threat of execution of the decree by the respondents. There was no evidence of an application for execution, no steps taken by the respondents to implement the court's decision, and no proof of threats to evict the applicant or cancel his land titles. The respondents were merely performing their duties as administrators of the estate, not executing court orders. Furthermore, the administration of the estate is already the subject of a sepa…
Source excerpt
- Stay Of Execution
- Pending Appeal
- Administration Of Estates
- Land Title Cancellation