Lambrou and Another v Rodoussakis
Lambrou and Another v Rodoussakis (Civil Appeal No. 26 of 1956) [1950] EACA 247 (1 January 1950)
The Court held that the amended plaint did not introduce a new cause of action, as the respondent's claim consistently sought her rightful share of estate revenue. The effective date for limitation was the filing of the original plaint, not the amendment. The preliminary adjudication by Mahon, J. was a judgment giving rise to a preliminary decree, not an interlocutory order, and thus was not appealable at this stage. On the factual issue, the Court found that the respondent was fraudulently induced to sign exhibit 1, and no genuine settlement of accounts occurred. The appeal was dismissed, an…
Source excerpt
- Limitation Periods
- Amendment Of Pleadings
- Partnership Accounts
- Co-ownership Disputes
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation