Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Stanbic Bank Uganda Limited v Ugaden Cocoa Trading Limited & Another (Civil Suit 159 of 2020) [2023] UGCommC 222 (11 December 2023)
The High Court held that a demand overdraft was due on demand, rejected the claim that the suit was premature, and found the defendants in breach.
Greenland Bank Ltd (In Liquidation) v Richard Ssekiziyivu t/a Global General Auctioneers (HCT-00-CC-CS 501 of 2001) [2007] UGCommC 72 (5 September 2007)
The High Court dismissed a bank's claim for an alleged overdraft balance and the defendant's counter-claim, finding the bank's records confused and the disputed loan unproved.
Pearl Motors Ltd v Bank of Baroda (U) Ltd (Civil Appeal 15 of 2002) [2004] UGSC 34 (20 December 2004)
The Supreme Court found that the operative contract between the parties was Exh. D1, not Exh. D7, which was merely a demand letter following default. The appellant had not fully discharged its contractual obligations under the overdraft facility, as it failed to pay unapplied interest that accrued in accordance with Bank of Uganda regulations. The Court of Appeal properly re-evaluated the evidence and correctly found that the respondent's refusal to release the securities was not a breach of contract, as the appellant's indebtedness had not been fully settled. The Supreme Court dismissed the…
Source excerpt
Rahul J Patel v DFCU Bank (formerly Gold Trust Bank) (Civil Suit No. 146 of 2002) [2004] UGCommC 9 (23 March 2004)
The court rejected claims for disbursement losses on an overdraft facility, but ordered restitution of two-thirds of charges taken on the undisbursed portion.
Bank of Baroda v M/S Arkay (U) Ltd and Others (HCCS NO. 319 OF 1999) [2003] UGHC 115 (3 November 2003)
The High Court of Uganda entered judgment for Bank of Baroda in a suit to recover an unpaid overdraft, finding the loan, guarantees, default, and notice proved.
Twaha Luyimbazi Katongolu v The liquidator of Greenland Bank (Misc. Appl. No. 1117 of 2000) (Misc. Appl. No. 1117 of 2000) [2000] UGHC 21 (14 September 2000)
The High Court dismissed an application for a temporary injunction, holding that the property was not shown to be the subject of the suit and the suit was not for the required relief.
