Download

Uganda Judgment

Commercial Court of Uganda

Greenland Bank Ltd (In Liquidation) v Richard Ssekiziyivu t/a Global General Auctioneers (HCT-00-CC-CS 501 of 2001) [2007] UGCommC 72 (5 September 2007)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence and advancement of the disputed Shs.60m overdraft facility to the defendant, as there was no evidence of application or acceptance. The only admitted facility was Shs.18m, which the defendant acknowledged borrowing. The bank's records were confused due to the defendant's dual role as customer and service provider, leading to a mix-up between borrowed funds and facilitation advances for debt recovery. The imposition of interest was disputed by the defendant and not deemed accepted. Both the plaintiff's claim and the defendant's counter-claim for special damages were not strictly proved. The court held that neither party was entitled to the reliefs sought, and ordered that the loss should fall where it lies, with each party bearing its own costs.

Court disposition

Suit and counter-claim dismissed for want of sufficient evidence.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
  • The defendant's counter-claim is dismissed.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Greenland Bank Ltd (In Liquidation)

Plaintiff Counsel: Godfrey Zziwa

Richard Ssekiziyivu t/a Global General Auctioneers

Defendant Counsel: Sarah Kisubi

Amounts and remedies

  • Plaintiff's Claim (principal and Interest): UGX 68,069,457
  • Defendant's Admitted Borrowing: UGX 18,000,000
  • Defendant's Counter Claim (fixed Deposit): UGX 336,078

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Suit / Final Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff argued that the defendant operated account No. 223383-081, obtained overdraft facilities, and at the closure of the bank was still indebted in the sum of Shs.68,069,457. The plaintiff relied on bank records, account statements, waste cheques, and offer letters to substantiate the claim. It was asserted that the defendant had not settled the overdraft and was liable for the outstanding balance and interest.
Respondent
The defendant denied operating the specified account, stating he operated account No. 223383-000, which had a credit balance. He admitted borrowing Shs.18m but disputed the alleged Shs.60m overdraft, claiming no application or acceptance of such facility. The defendant argued that funds advanced were for debt recovery services, not loans, and that the bank's failure to pay for services led to account debits and interest accrual. He counter-claimed for fixed deposit balances and land, asserting the bank's records were confused due to his dual role.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Evidence Act, Section 101

    Burden of proof in civil matters lies on the party asserting the affirmative, and must be discharged on a balance of probabilities.

  2. 02

    Kampala District Land Board & George Mitala v Venansio Babweyana, SCCA No. 2 of 2007

    Special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved to be awarded.

  3. 03

    Essays in African Banking, Grace P. T. Mukubwa, p.126

    A bank is entitled to fair and reasonable interest on an overdraft where no express or implied agreement exists, but acceptance of periodic statements showing interest implies acceptance of the rate.

  4. 04

    Lord Mansfield C.J., ex turpi causa doctrine

    No claim arises from a base cause; courts will not assist a party whose cause of action is founded on an immoral or illegal act.

  5. 05

    Civil Procedure Rules, Order 8

    Counter-claims are cross-actions and must be pleaded and strictly proved, especially for special damages.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence and advancement of the disputed Shs.60m overdraft facility to the defendant, as there was no evidence of application or acceptance. The only admitted facility was Shs.18m, which the defendant acknowledged borrowing. The bank's records were confused due to the defendant's dual role as customer and service provider, leading to a mix-up between borrowed funds and facilitation advances for debt recovery. The imposition of interest was disputed by the defendant and not deemed accepted. Both the plaintiff's claim and the defendant's counter-claim for special damages were not strictly proved. The court held that neither party was entitled to the reliefs sought, and ordered that the loss should fall where it lies, with each party bearing its own costs.

Obiter and limits

  • The bank's policy allowing the defendant to overdraw his account without corresponding deposits was deplorable and unethical, contributing to its closure.
  • Two wrongs cannot make a right; the confusion in accounts was due to both parties' conduct.
  • The court is unable to determine with accuracy what rightfully belongs to either party under the arrangement due to the mess in the records.
  • This is a fit and proper case where the loss should fall where it lies, and neither party earns credit for the confusion.

Court disposition

Suit and counter-claim dismissed for want of sufficient evidence.

  • The plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
  • The defendant's counter-claim is dismissed.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.

Source and reliance status

Commercial Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Commercial Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2007] UGCommC 72

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang2057\deflangfe2057{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f171\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f172\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f174\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f175\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f176\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f177\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f178\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f179\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph

Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid9381576 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid9381576 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid394904\rsid482966\rsid553446\rsid1069948\rsid2181470\rsid2188927\rsid2442785\rsid2645024\rsid2765614\rsid3046933\rsid3418771\rsid3491986\rsid3689802\rsid3805924\rsid3810988\rsid3873762 \rsid4412076\rsid4480320\rsid4673141\rsid4866099\rsid4867041\rsid4983260\rsid5396711\rsid5405691\rsid6046788\rsid6572512\rsid6767613\rsid7750729\rsid8146134\rsid8288335\rsid8595845\rsid8670358\rsid8982368\rsid9313326\rsid9381576\rsid10296737\rsid10518029 \rsid10824286\rsid10893676\rsid12084596\rsid12463227\rsid12478582\rsid13249763\rsid13396897\rsid13713712\rsid14053552\rsid14754048\rsid15027466\rsid15155123\rsid15297869\rsid15363535\rsid15539704\rsid15560632\rsid15749359\rsid15935820\rsid16267597 \rsid16670938}{\*\generator

Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author ikobusinge}{\operator jchemeri}{\creatim\yr2009\mo1\dy23\hr14\min37}{\revtim\yr2009\mo1\dy23\hr14\min37}{\version2}{\edmins0}{\nofpages8}{\nofwords2392} {\nofchars13641}{\*\company Judicircature}{\nofcharsws16001}{\vern24689}}\paperw11909\paperh16834\margl1496\margr689 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace187\dgvspace127 \dghorigin1496\dgvorigin1440\dghshow0\dgvshow2\jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot4412076\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8595845 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8595845 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8595845 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql

\li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8595845 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \psz9\linex0\colsx708\endnhere\sectlinegrid254\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid4412076\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxc\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid553446 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid4673141 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid10893676 1}}}{\cs16\insrsid4673141 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4673141 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \ql

\li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\ul\insrsid6046788\charrsid10296737 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\insrsid4412076\charrsid10296737 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par \par IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \par (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION) \par \par HCT-00-CC-CS-0501-2001 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\insrsid4412076\charrsid10296737 \par GREENLAND BANK LTD \par (IN LIQUIDATION) :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PLAINTIFF \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\insrsid4412076\charrsid10296737 VERSUS \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\insrsid4412076\charrsid10296737 \par RICHARD SSEKIZIYIVU t/a \par GLOBAL GENERAL AUCTIONEERS ::::::::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANT \par \par BEFORE: }{\b\ul\insrsid4412076\charrsid10296737 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE YOROKAMU BAMWINE \par \par J U D G M E N T}{\b\insrsid4412076\charrsid10296737 : \par \par }{\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 The plaintiff\rquote s claim against the

defendant is for Shs.68}{\insrsid10296737\charrsid10296737 , 069,457}{\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 = being alleged outstanding balance on the princ ipal sum and interest thereon. It is the plaintiff\rquote s case that the defendant while operating account No. 223383-081 with the plaintiff obtained overdraft facilities and at the closure of the bank he was still indebted. The defendant\rquote s reply thereto is that he has never operated the said account. That he operated account No. 223383-000 which had a credit balance of Shs.336}{\insrsid10296737\charrsid10296737 , 078}{\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 = on 28}{ \super\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 th}{\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 February, 1999.}{\insrsid4412076\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 \par At the trial, the following facts were agreed: \par 1.\tab That the defendant was a customer of the plaintiff. \par 2.\tab That the defendant obtained overdraft facilities from the plaintiff. \par \par The following issues were framed for Court\rquote s determination: \par }\pard \qj \fi-720\li720\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 1.\tab Whether the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum specified in the plaint or at all. \par 2.\tab Whether the parties are entitled to the reliefs

claimed. \par \par Representations: \par }{\i\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 Mr. Godfrey Zziwa for the plaintiff. \par Ms Sarah Kisubi for the defendant. \par }{\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 Before I delve into the assessment of the evidence presented by both parties, I consider it necessary to warn myself on the burden of proof in a case such as this. This being a civil matter, the standard of proof is on a balance of probabilities}{ \insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 . A fact is said to be proved when the Court is satisfied as to its truth. The general rule is that the burden of proof lies on the party who asserts the affirmative of the issue or question in dispute. When that party adduces evidence sufficient to raise a presumption that what he asserts is true, he is said to shift the burden of proof, that is, his allegation is presumed to be true, un less his opponent adduces evidence to rebut the presumption.}{\insrsid482966\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 \par In the instant case, the plaintiff has alleged that the defendant owes it Shs.68}{\insrsid10296737\charrsid10296737 , 069, 459}{\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 =. The defendant has made a counter claim alleging that the plaintiff owes him

Shs.33}{ \insrsid10296737\charrsid10296737 , 620,242}{\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 =. The burden rests on each side to prove its claim. \par \par As to whether the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum prayed for or at all, the plaintiff\rquote s case is based on the evidence of two witnesses: Mr. Paul Zziwa (PW1) and Mr. Ben Ssekabira (PW2). These two witnesses are involved in the liquidation process of the plaintiff bank. Their evidence is }{\insrsid9381576\charrsid10296737 based on}{\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 the records found on the plaintiff\rquote s files. It is not evidence based on their personal knowledge of the facts in issue. \par \par The evidence of PW1 Zziwa is based on the defendant\rquote s Bank Account Statement and the statement of balance. They are on record as P. Exh.

1. His evidence is further based on waste cheques drawn on Account Number 0223383 by the defendant during the period in issue, and two letters of offer, one dated 22}{ \super\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 nd}{\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 August, 1995 for Shs.18,000,000= and another dated 20}{\super\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 th}{\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 November, 1995 for an overdraft facility of Shs.60,000,000=.}{\insrsid3873762\charrsid10296737 The defendant duly acknowledges the first facility of Shs.18m. He disputes the second one. The total sum on the w aste cheques is far higher than the Shs.18m duly acknowledged by the defendant. The defendant case is that he settled the said credit facility. As the credit facility of Shs.18m by the plaintiff to the defendant is not disputed by the defendant, I harbo ur no doubt in my }{\insrsid9381576\charrsid10296737 mind that}{\insrsid3873762\charrsid10296737 the facility was indeed extended to the defendant. The problem is with the second facility of Shs.60m allegedly extended to the defendant by the plaintiff in their offer letter of November 20, 1995.}{\insrsid3689802\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid3873762\charrsid10296737 \par I have addressed my mind to the said letter offer, P. Exh. V1. It makes reference to the defendant\rquote s application for an overdraft of Shs.60m to buy and process coffee for sale. It

also shows that the bank had approved the amount of Shs.60m and sets out the terms and conditions }{\insrsid10824286\charrsid10296737 of }{\insrsid3873762\charrsid10296737 o ffer. This document is said to have been found in the defendant\rquote s personal file with the plaintiff bank. However, as fate would have it, the liquidators appear not to have found any such application on record. \par }{\insrsid14754048\charrsid10296737 \par The letter also indicates that the intended offeree of the overdraft}{\insrsid15297869\charrsid10296737 facility was required to sign the necessary security documents if the terms and conditions stipulated in the offer letter were acceptable to him. There is no evidence of the defendant accepting the terms and conditions of the loa n. It is trite that the formation of a contract entails one party making an offer to the other, who must in turn accept the offer, thus formulating an agreement. The defendant denies ever applying for the said facility and/or receiving it. The burden r e sts on the plaintiff to prove that he did. The evidence on record is short of such proof. There is doubt that the loan was applied for and advanced to him. P. Exh. X1 makes the doubt stronger. It is a letter dated 30/5/1995 addressed to the defendant.

It refers to an application by the defendant for extension of his overdraft facility of Shs.60m. It purports to grant extension of the same for six months to enable him to buy coffee, process it and sell it. As I have already indicated, the loan offer is dated 20/11/95. P. Exh. X1 implies that there was an extension of a loan five months before it was granted.}{\insrsid14754048\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid15297869\charrsid10296737 \par The defendant\rquote s witness, DW3 Sebagala, alluded to falsifications in the bank before it was closed. In my view, the records relied upon by the p laintiff in respect of the alleged loan support that view. Accordingly, Court is not satisfied that the defendant took out an overdraft of Shs.60m as alleged. \par \par I have considered the fact of the defendant\rquote s continued withdrawals with no corresponding deposits. The law as I understand it is that drawing}{\insrsid12478582\charrsid10296737 a cheque or accepting a bill payable at the banker\rquote s where there are no funds sufficient to meet its amounts to a request for an overdraft.}{\insrsid15297869\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid12478582\charrsid10296737 \par The proved overdrawals in this case}{\insrsid3046933\charrsid10296737 beg an explanation. The defendant has offered one. He says that he was the plaintiff}{\insrsid2765614\charrsid10296737 \rquote s customer as well as a

service provider to it in the capacity of a debt collector. That when the volume of work was still low, he would use his own money to recover debts from loan defaulters and t hereafter file a bill of costs to them for payment. That when the volume of work increased, he failed to raise the requisite funds. He testified:}{\insrsid12478582\charrsid10296737 \par }\pard \qj \li1122\ri1309\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin1309\lin1122\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\i\insrsid2765614\charrsid10296737 \'93 So I used to write to the customer to pay. Then I could approach the bank and advise them that with this type of recovery, I needed their (Bank) hand. They agreed.\'94 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\insrsid15560632\charrsid10296737 \par He then says that after indicating to the bank what he needed to carry out }{\insrsid1069948\charrsid10296737 the }{\insrsid15560632\charrsid10296737 executions, he would be asked by the bank to make}{\insrsid3810988\charrsid10296737 a cheque of such amount and take it to the manager of the bank to authorise payment. He would then receive cash to go and carry out the execution. After the recovery exercise, he would prepare a fresh bill, including his costs and fees. The amount he took in cash would remain on the account as an overdraft to

him. T h is procedure as stated by the defendant finds favour in the evidence of DW2 Mawanda, an employee of the bank at the time in the capacity of Credit Officer and DW3 Sebagala, an Assistant Manager at the time. They impressed me as truthful witnesses in that regard. While the practice was open to abuse and had to be changed upon intervention of Bank}{\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 of Uganda in exercise of its supervisory role, its existence has been sufficiently established. I have seen no reason to doubt the evidence of the two witnesses in that regard. It is evidence }{\insrsid3805924\charrsid10296737 of former bank official}{ \insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 based on }{\insrsid3805924\charrsid10296737 their }{\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 personal knowledge of the bank}{\insrsid3805924\charrsid10296737 \rquote s practices at the time}{\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 .} {\insrsid15560632\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \par The learned author of Essays in African Banking, Grace P. T. Mukubwa, commenting on a related issue states (at p. 126): \par }\pard \qj \li1122\ri1122\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin1122\lin1122\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \'93A bank i s only entitled to fair and reasonable interest on an overdraft where the parties have not expressly or impliedly

agreed to the rate of interest payable. However, where a person receives periodic statements on which it is shown that compound interest was charged on the amount of his overdraft and he does not dispute the accuracy of those statements he is deemed to have accepted that interest should be charged at the rate.\'94 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \par In the instant case, the defendant came out openly when the issue of interest on the payments was put to him long before the bank was closed. In a letter, P. Exh. V dated 31/12/97, he complained to the Credit Manager of the plaintiff bank as follows:

\par }\pard \qj \li1122\ri1122\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin1122\lin1122\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \'93Dear Sir, \par Re: PAYING OFF LOAN ACCOUNT NO. 0223383. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \par }\pard \qj \li1122\ri1122\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin1122\lin1122\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 I am happy to the fact that you off settled Shs.57}{\b\i\insrsid6767613\charrsid10296737 , 000,000}{\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 = million shillings from the above account. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \par }\pard \qj \li1122\ri1122\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin1122\lin1122\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 It\rquote s unfortunate that when I was given some work to execute, I used to get some money from this Account to recover, which was debited on my account as a loan. Unfortunately, when I reco vered, since 1995 it took time to pay me which caused this interest up to this year 1997 when you settled off some money from my account. Since then, the

interest was Shs.25}{\b\i\insrsid6767613\charrsid10296737 , 225,015}{ \b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 = costs and fees Shs.45}{\b\i\insrsid6767613\charrsid10296737 , 086,400}{\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 = totaling to Shs.70}{\b\i\insrsid6767613\charrsid10296737 , 311,425}{ \b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 = causing Shs.13}{\b\i\insrsid6767613\charrsid10296737 , 311,415}{\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 = on the interest unsettled. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \par }\pard \qj \li1122\ri1122\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin1122\lin1122\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 I request you kindly to take off this interest from this account and request you again kindly to give more work as to settle off the balance on my account. I have deposited Shs.1}{\b\i\insrsid6767613\charrsid10296737 , 000,000}{ \b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 = on my account. \par \par Yours faithfully, \par \par \'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85.. \par Global General Auctioneers}{\b\i\insrsid4867041\charrsid10296737 \'94}{\b\i\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737

{\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \par This letter, }{\insrsid13713712\charrsid10296737 relied on by}{\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 the plaintiff, is evidence that the defendant disputed imposition of interest on payments he had received from the plaintiff as facilitation in the debts recovery process. In my opinion, he cannot be deemed to have accepted that interest should be charged at the rate now claimed by the plaintiff or at all. It is significant to note that in the same letter the defendant did not dispute}{\insrsid12463227\charrsid10296737 the plaintiff\rquote s entire claim against him. He only disputed the imposition of interest.}{\insrsid15155123\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid12463227\charrsid10296737 \par I have considered the evidence relating to the manner in which funds would be advanced to him (the defendant) and how he would eventually be paid for rendered services. This evidence is contained in the testi mony of the defendant and that of his two witnesse}{\insrsid13713712\charrsid10296737 s}{\insrsid12463227\charrsid10296737 , DW2 Mawanda and DW3 Sebagala. From their evidence, the issue of interest on money advanced to the defendant to carry out debt recoveries arose long before the plaintiff bank was closed. The top managem ent found the system of debiting and crediting the defendant\rquote s account wanting and changed it. \par \par Learned counsel

for the defendant has argued that if the bank had honoured its obligation to pay the defendant for his services, his account would not have been in debit. Similarly, that if the bank had opted to credit the defendant\rquote s account upon his request for costs, with the amount that he was genuinely entitled }{\insrsid9381576\charrsid10296737 to,}{\insrsid12463227\charrsid10296737 the defendant would not have overdrawn his account with the said monies and no interest would have accrued on them. }{\insrsid13713712\charrsid10296737 For academic rather than practical purposes}{\insrsid16267597\charrsid10296737 , I\rquote m inclined to accept these arguments.}{\insrsid13713712\charrsid10296737 But that\rquote s the furthest I shall go.}{\insrsid12463227\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid16267597\charrsid10296737 The plaintiff\rquote s claim is for special damages. The rule has long been established that special damages must be pleaded and proved by the party claiming them if they are to be awarded. From the evidence, other than the Shs.18m the defendant }{\insrsid15749359\charrsid10296737 admits borrowing }{\insrsid16267597\charrsid10296737 to finance his coffee business, }{ \insrsid15749359\charrsid10296737 on the balance of probabilities, }{\insrsid16267597\charrsid10296737 he did not borrow }{\insrsid15749359\charrsid10296737 any more. What is}{\insrsid16267597\charrsid10296737

reflected on A/C No. 223383 \endash 081}{ \insrsid15749359\charrsid10296737 as borrowed money resulted from the plaintiff\rquote s attempt to re-organise its records, and its }{\insrsid16267597\charrsid10296737 failure to make a distinction between borrowed funds, as in the case of the Shs.18m overdraft, and funds advanced to the defendant as facilitation to him to carry out his work of debt collection.}{\insrsid8982368\charrsid10296737 The result was that the accounts became so mixed up and confused that the bank failed to honour its obligation to settle the defendant\rquote s due claims, and the defendant failed to clear the debits o n his account. In my view, neither party earns credit for the mess.}{\insrsid16267597\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid8982368\charrsid10296737 \par I would answer the first issue in the negative and I do so. \par \par As to whether the parties are entitled to the reliefs sought, in view of my findings in the first issue, the plaintiff is not entitled to any of the reliefs prayed for in the plaint. The suit would be dismissed.}{\insrsid394904\charrsid10296737 }{ \insrsid8982368\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid394904\charrsid10296737 \par As regards the defendant\rquote s counter claim, the legal position is indeed that a counter claim is a cross-action. Being a claim for special damages, it too must be pleaded and strictly proved. \par \par The

defendant counter claims for the balance on the fixed deposits given to the bank while obtaining the over draft facility of Shs.18m. He also counter-claims for land comprised in Block 25 Plot 124. The plaintiff\rquote s case is th at the fixed deposits were used to reduce the defendant\rquote s indebtedness. \par \par I have already pointed out the fact that because of the defendant\rquote s dual role as the plaintiff\rquote s customer and a service provider to it in the capacity }{\insrsid9381576\charrsid10296737 of a}{\insrsid394904\charrsid10296737 }{ \insrsid9381576\charrsid10296737 debt}{\insrsid394904\charrsid10296737 -collector, all transactions apparently being handled on the same account, the accounts became so mixed up and confused that it cannot be said with any }{ \insrsid15935820\charrsid10296737 de}{\insrsid8146134\charrsid10296737 g}{\insrsid15935820\charrsid10296737 ree}{\insrsid394904\charrsid10296737 of certainty that the defendant paid back the Shs.18m advanced to him}{\insrsid15935820\charrsid10296737 together with interest thereon}{\insrsid394904\charrsid10296737 . No explanation has been given to Court as to why the security was realized during the pendancy of the suit or why the defendant, a}{\insrsid2188927\charrsid10296737 }{ \insrsid394904\charrsid10296737 knowledgeable High Court Bailiff, took no steps to halt the sale pending determination of the

suit. The Court is cutely aware that two wrongs cannot make a right. However, it is the view of the Court}{ \insrsid10518029\charrsid10296737 that the bank\rquote s policy which allowed the defendant to overdraw his account with no corresponding deposits was deplorable and unethical. }{\insrsid15363535\charrsid10296737 Little wonder that it was closed.}{ \insrsid10518029\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid15363535\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid10518029\charrsid10296737 It is argued that the defendant,}{\insrsid15539704\charrsid10296737 as an innocent customer and service provider of the plaintiff should not be prejudiced and/or unfairly put to task to answer for the same. }{ \insrsid10518029\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid15539704\charrsid10296737 \par I\rquote m unable to accept this argument. The law as I understand it is that no claim arises from a base cause. This policy was well summarized by Lord Mansfield C. J. in the 18}{\super\insrsid15539704\charrsid10296737 th}{ \insrsid15539704\charrsid10296737 Century when he declared: \par }\pard \qj \li1122\ri1122\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin1122\lin1122\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\b\i\insrsid15539704\charrsid10296737 No Court will lend its aid to a man who found}{\b\i\insrsid6572512\charrsid10296737 s his cause of action upon an imm}{\b\i\insrsid2188927\charrsid10296737

o}{\b\i\insrsid6572512\charrsid10296737 ral or illegal act. If the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa \'85\'85 the Court says he has no right to be assisted.}{ \b\i\insrsid15539704\charrsid10296737 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10296737 {\insrsid6572512\charrsid10296737 \par Thus in }{\b\ul\insrsid6572512\charrsid10296737 Thackwell \endash Vs- Barclays Bank plc [1986] 1 All E. R. 676}{\insrsid4983260\charrsid10296737 the plaintiff claimed damages from Barclays when the bank had wrongfully accredited a cheque for }{ \insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 \'a344,227 to the wrong account after the bank had failed to notice that the endorsement on the cheque had been forged. The money in fact represented the dishonest proceeds of a fraud on a finance company. Again}{ \insrsid2188927\charrsid10296737 st}{\insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 such an unedifying background the judge refused to allow Thackwell to recover a penny of the money because it was contrary to public policy to allow the plaintiff to use of moneys which had been obtained by fraud in the first place.}{\insrsid6572512\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 \par Applying the same principle to the facts of this case, the bank failed to honour its obligation to the defendant and the defendant failed to clear the debits

on his account thanks to the }{\insrsid2188927\charrsid10296737 defendant\rquote s }{ \insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 conflict of interest}{\insrsid2188927\charrsid10296737 . }{\insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 }{\insrsid8288335\charrsid10296737 As a result of the said mess in its records, }{\insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 Court is }{ \insrsid8288335\charrsid10296737 now }{\insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 unable to determine }{\insrsid3491986\charrsid10296737 with any degree of accuracy }{\insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 what rightfully belongs to either party un der the arrangement. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that the defendant has }{\insrsid2188927\charrsid10296737 himself }{\insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 proved}{\insrsid13249763\charrsid10296737 }{\insrsid2188927\charrsid10296737 hi}{ \insrsid13249763\charrsid10296737 s claim against the plaintiff. I consider this a fit and proper case where Court ought to order that the loss falls where it lies. Accordingly, the co unter claimant is not entitled to the reliefs claimed in the counter-claim. The counter-claim would also be dismissed.}{\insrsid4866099\charrsid10296737 \par }{\insrsid13249763\charrsid10296737 For the reasons I have endeavoured to give, }{\insrsid2188927\charrsid10296737 both }{\insrsid13249763\charrsid10296737 the suit and the counter-claim are dismissed}{\insrsid3491986\charrsid10296737 for want of sufficient evidence to tilt the balance either way}{\insrsid13249763\charrsid10296737 . Each side shall bear its own costs. Ordered accordingly. \par \par Dated at Kampala this 6}{\super\insrsid13249763\charrsid10296737 th}{\insrsid13249763\charrsid10296737 day of September, 2007. \par \par \par Yorokamu Bamwine \par }{\b\insrsid13249763\charrsid10296737 J U D G E \par }}

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Kampala District Land Board & George Mitala v Venansio Babweyana, SCCA No. 2 of 2007

Case cited

Thackwell v Barclays Bank plc [1986] 1 All E.R. 676

Case cited

Evidence Act, Section 101

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Rules, Order 8

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.