Uganda Case Law

Malinga Patrick v Otim Emou Alfred, Ojoo Naptali Ismail & Esunget Stephen

Malinga Patrick v Otim Emou Alfred, Ojoo Naptali Ismail & Esunget Stephen (Civil Appeal 21 of 2023) [2024] UGHC 2 (16 January 2024)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

Civil Appeal 21 of 2023

Judge

Adonyo, J

The High Court found that neither the appellant nor the respondents acquired legal or equitable title to the suit land. The appellant failed to comply with the terms of his allocation letter and did not obtain a lease offer or make requisite payments. The 2nd respondent also failed to meet the terms of allocation, and his interest lapsed before purportedly selling to the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent's allocation was made while a prior lease offer to a third party (Akwii Judith) was still running, and there was no evidence that the lease had been cancelled. The Soroti District Land Board…

Source excerpt

• Land Allocation
• Pecuniary Jurisdiction
• Burden Of Proof
• Double Allocation
• Leasehold Interests

Agha Khan Foundation (U) v Nanteza and Another

Agha Khan Foundation (U) v Nanteza and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 1974 of 2022) [2023] UGHCLD 53 (9 March 2023)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Miscellaneous Application No. 1974 of 2022

Judge

Nkonge, J

The High Court declined to review earlier land orders, finding the dispute’s fraud and title issues needed oral evidence in an ordinary suit.

• Review Of Court Orders
• Mailo Land Ownership
• Leasehold Interests
• Fair Hearing Rights
• Land-disputes
• Review-of-court-orders

Nyarinkindi and 2 Others v New Forst Company Limited and 2 Others

Nyarinkindi and 2 Others v New Forst Company Limited and 2 Others (Civil Suit No. 409 of 2008) [2021] UGHCLD 131 (12 August 2021)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Civil Suit No. 409 of 2008

Judge

Kawesa, J

The court found that although the Plaintiffs were registered proprietors of the suit land, the Uganda Land Commission had no authority to lease land within Namwasa Central Forest Reserve, which has never been degazetted. The evidence, including survey reports and witness testimony, established that the suit land falls within the boundaries of the forest reserve. The law and binding precedents dictate that any title or lease granted over such land is illegal and void ab initio. The court held that the principle of indefeasibility of title does not protect titles obtained in violation of statut…

Source excerpt

• Registration Of Titles
• Forest Reserves
• Leasehold Interests
• Illegality Of Title
• Indefeasibility Of Title
• Public Land Management

Nile Construction General Contractors Ltd & Anor v Kanyeihamba

Nile Construction General Contractors Ltd & Anor v Kanyeihamba (Miscellaneous Application No. 405 of 2016) [2016] UGHCLD 31 (22 November 2016)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Miscellaneous Application No. 405 of 2016

Judge

Bashaija, J

The court found that the Respondent was in deliberate and willful contempt of a clear court order requiring him to deposit signed transfer forms and the certificate of title for the suit land after the Applicants had deposited the outstanding purchase price. The Respondent's actions in seeking to reopen issues already settled, introducing extraneous matters, and failing to comply with the order—despite having the opportunity to challenge it through review or appeal—constituted a flagrant disregard for the authority and dignity of the court. The court emphasized that compliance with court orde…

Source excerpt

• Contempt Of Court
• Enforcement Of Court Orders
• Leasehold Interests
• Vesting Orders
• Remedies For Noncompliance

Isaac Walukagga v James Balintuma

Isaac Walukagga v James Balintuma (Miscellaneous Application No. 2219 of 2013) [2014] UGHCEBD 8 (18 July 2014)

Court

High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)

Case number

Miscellaneous Application No. 2219 of 2013

The High Court allowed an objector application and released 25 decimals of land from attachment, finding the applicant was in possession as owner before execution.

• Objector Proceedings
• Attachment And Execution
• Proprietary Possession
• Sale Of Land
• Leasehold Interests
• Objector-proceedings

Kampefu Farm Ltd v Bunkedeko

Kampefu Farm Ltd v Bunkedeko (Civil Appeal No. 28 of 2009) [2013] UGHCLD 18 (22 February 2013)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Civil Appeal No. 28 of 2009

Judge

Murangira, J

The High Court found that the respondent was the legitimate registered owner of the suit land (LRV 2879 Folio 3 Gomba Block 384 plot 4) and that the appellant's title did not relate to the respondent's land. Expert evidence established that the two parcels were distinct and distant, and the appellant's claim of occupation and fraud was unsupported by evidence. The respondent's acquisition of title was not fraudulent, as there was no proof of knowledge of any unregistered interest or dishonesty. The respondent's interests in the land continued despite the lease expiry, as the controlling autho…

Source excerpt

• Title Registration
• Land Ownership Disputes
• Trespass
• Fraud In Land Transactions
• Leasehold Interests
• Pecuniary Jurisdiction

Maria Mpinga and Others v Sensalire and Others

Maria Mpinga and Others v Sensalire and Others (Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2001 and No. 118 of 2003; Civil Appeal No. 118 of 2003) [2009] UGCA 78 (31 March 2009)

Court

Court of Appeal of Uganda

Case number

Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2001 and No. 118 of 2003 ; Civil Appeal No. 118 of 2003

Judge

Engwau, JA, Kitumba, JA, Twinomujuni, JA

The Court of Appeal found that the appellants failed to prove the existence of a valid lease over Plot 89, as required by law. The evidence showed that the only registered lease was over Plot 67, and the payment of ground rent or occupation of Plot 89 did not amount to a leasehold interest. The appellants' claim of customary tenancy or tenancy by occupancy was not substantiated by the pleadings or evidence, and the suit was filed before the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions came into force. The 5th respondent was found to be a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, havin…

Source excerpt

• Specific Performance
• Leasehold Interests
• Bona Fide Purchaser
• Customary Tenancy
• Registration Of Titles
• Remedies In Land Disputes

Nalikka Mpinga and Others v Ernest Sdiakadde Sensaire and Others

Nalikka Mpinga and Others v Ernest Sdiakadde Sensaire and Others (Civil Suit No. 432 of 1989) [1999] UGHC 61 (15 January 1999)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

Civil Suit No. 432 of 1989

Judge

Tinyinondi, J

The court held that the plaintiffs proved a lease only for Plot 67, not Plot 89. The 5th defendant was protected as a bona fide purchaser, though the buildings on Plot 89 belonged to the plaintiffs' family.

• Specific Performance
• Bona Fide Purchaser
• Leasehold Interests
• Customary Tenancy
• Fraud In Land Transactions
• Ownership Of Buildings

Resty Nantongo v David Kayondo

Resty Nantongo v David Kayondo [1994] UGSC 1 (17 October 1994)

Court

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda allowed an appeal against an interim injunction, holding that the appellant’s registered leasehold interest could not be restrained on the respondent’s unchallenged claim.

• Injunctions
• Caveats On Title
• Leasehold Interests
• Priority Of Registration
• Leasehold-interests
• Caveats-on-title