Uganda Case Law

Buyungo v Nyansiano and 6 Others

Buyungo v Nyansiano and 6 Others (Civil Application 10 of 2022; Civil Application 12 of 2021) [2023] UGSC 41 (5 October 2023)

Court

Supreme Court of Uganda

Case number

Civil Application 10 of 2022 ; Civil Application 12 of 2021

Judge

Owiny-Dollo, CJ, Mwondha, JSC, Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza, JSC, Tuhaise, JSC, Mike Chibita, JSC

The Supreme Court found that the respondents failed to file their appeal within the prescribed time due to the negligence of their former lawyers, not due to any dilatory conduct on their part. The court held that sufficient reason was established under Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, as lawyer error should not be visited on the client unless the client is complicit or guilty of delay. The court emphasized that rules are mandatory but allow for judicial discretion in cases where strict adherence would result in injustice. Given the substantive issues at stake regarding land ownership and t…

Source excerpt

• Extension Of Time
• Striking Out Notice Of Appeal
• Appeal Timelines
• Lawyer Negligence
• Burden Of Proof
• Land Ownership Disputes

Nanyanzi & 3 Others v Kakooza

Nanyanzi & 3 Others v Kakooza (Miscellaneous Application 39 of 2022) [2023] UGHC 393 (2 October 2023)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

Miscellaneous Application 39 of 2022

Judge

Katamba Nkwanga, J

The High Court reinstated an appeal dismissed for nonappearance, finding that the applicants had shown sufficient cause and that counsel’s negligence should not be visited on them.

• Reinstatement Of Appeal
• Dismissal For Want Of Prosecution
• Sufficient Cause
• Lawyer Negligence
• Party Diligence
• Reinstatement-of-appeal

Nagawa v Nakata and 2 Others

Nagawa v Nakata and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 1607 of 2022) [2023] UGHCLD 42 (28 March 2023)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Miscellaneous Application No. 1607 of 2022

Judge

Basaza, J

The High Court reinstated a dismissed land suit after finding the applicant had shown sufficient cause, and ordered the applicant’s lawyer to pay costs personally.

• Reinstatement Of Suit
• Dismissal For Nonappearance
• Sufficient Cause
• Costs Orders
• Lawyer Negligence
• Reinstatement-of-suit

Kiddawalime Bakery Ltd & 2 Ors v Unga Millers (U) Ltd

Kiddawalime Bakery Ltd & 2 Ors v Unga Millers (U) Ltd (Miscellaneous Application No. 975 of 2017) [2018] UGCommC 52 (11 August 2018)

Court

Commercial Court of Uganda

Case number

Miscellaneous Application No. 975 of 2017

The court found that the applicants' failure to file a written statement of defence within the prescribed time was due to the negligence of their former lawyers, not their own fault. The court held that such negligence constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time, as established by precedent. The court exercised its discretion under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules to grant the applicants an extension of 7 days from the date of the ruling to file their defence. The court also determined that costs would be in the cause. The prelimina…

Source excerpt

• Extension Of Time
• Failure To File Defence
• Service Of Summons
• Lawyer Negligence

Bulwadda Kizito v Muluba Farm Limited and Another

Bulwadda Kizito v Muluba Farm Limited and Another (Civil Application 92 of 2003) [2003] UGCA 24 (3 October 2003)

Court

Court of Appeal of Uganda

Case number

Civil Application 92 of 2003

Judge

Okello, JA

The Court of Appeal granted an extension of time to lodge an appeal, holding that the applicant was not blameworthy for delay caused by his lawyers.

• Extension Of Time
• Lawyer Negligence
• Appeal Lodgment
• Court Discretion
• Extension-of-time
• Appeal-lodgment