Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Ntege v Tomusange Lasito and Others (MISC. APPLICATION NO 951 OF 2024) [2025] UGHC 245 (30 April 2025)
The High Court dismissed an application to review a prior judgment, finding the relied-upon inventory was irrelevant or post-dated the decision and that a pending appeal barred review.
Namutebi v Musoke and Another (MISC. APPLICATION NO. 21 OF 2023) [2024] UGHC 1204 (1 January 2024)
The High Court at Mpigi revoked a joint grant of letters of administration after one administrator died, and issued a fresh grant to the surviving daughter.
Kananura v Tibemanya and 2 Others (HCT-05-CV-MA 178 of 2022) [2023] UGHC 59 (31 August 2023)
The High Court of Uganda allowed an application to amend a plaint seeking revocation of letters of administration, finding the amendment would not introduce a new cause of action.
Mugisa and 2 Others v Byaruhanga Midomo (Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3 of 2021) [2022] UGHCCD 139 (31 August 2022)
The High Court held the Assistant Registrar lacked jurisdiction after consent judgment, set aside the registrar’s orders, and required estate accounting and distribution.
Sukhveer v Harvinder (Originating Summons 22 of 2019) [2022] UGHCFD 37 (14 June 2022)
The High Court dismissed an originating summons seeking to evict the respondent from estate property, holding the applicant had already validly distributed the property in an inventory.
Kivubuka v Kyagaba and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 132 of 2020) [2021] UGHCCD 231 (4 October 2021)
The High Court ordered estate administrators to include omitted children and property in the inventory and proceed with distribution under existing letters of administration.
Lubulwa Francis & 2 oers v Harriet Lubwama (O.S No.11 Of 2009) (O.S No.11 of 2009) [2010] UGHC 84 (19 October 2010)
The High Court dismissed an originating summons seeking revocation of letters of administration, holding that fraud and mismanagement must be proved in an ordinary suit.
