Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Public International Law [2016] AfCHPR 66

Munyandilikirwa v Republic of Rwanda (Order) (Application 023/2015)

Munyandilikirwa v Republic of Rwanda (Order) (Application 023/2015) [2016] AfCHPR 66 (3 June 2016)

The African Court held that Rwanda’s withdrawal of its Article 34(6) declaration did not suspend this pending application, and it would continue hearing the case.

  • African Court Jurisdiction
  • Withdrawal Of Declaration
  • Individual Access To Court
  • African-court-jurisdiction
  • Withdrawal-of-declaration
  • Individual-access-to-court
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2012] AfCHPR 121

Delta International Investments SA and Others v Republic of South Africa (Application No. 002/2012)

Delta International Investments SA and Others v Republic of South Africa (Application No. 002/2012) [2012] AfCHPR 121 (30 March 2012)

The African Court struck out an application by Delta International Investments and others because South Africa had not made the Article 34(6) declaration accepting individual access.

  • Jurisdiction Of Regional Courts
  • Individual Access To Court
  • State Declaration Requirement
  • Human Rights Protection
  • Jurisdiction
  • Individual-access-to-court
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2012] AfCHPR 3

Uko and Others v Republic of South Africa (Application No. 004/2012)

Uko and Others v Republic of South Africa (Application No. 004/2012) [2012] AfCHPR 3 (30 March 2012)

The African Court struck out Emmanuel Joseph Uko and Others v South Africa for lack of jurisdiction because South Africa had not made the Article 34(6) declaration.

  • Jurisdiction Of Regional Courts
  • Individual Access To Court
  • Declarations Under Protocol
  • Admissibility Requirements
  • Jurisdiction
  • Individual-access
Read case analysis
Public International Law [2012] AfCHPR 2

Timan v Republic of Sudan (Application No. 005/2012)

Timan v Republic of Sudan (Application No. 005/2012) [2012] AfCHPR 2 (30 March 2012)

The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights manifestly lacks jurisdiction to receive the application submitted on behalf of Amir Adam Timan against the Republic of the Sudan because Sudan has not made the declaration required under Article 34(6) of the Protocol. Article 5(3) entitles individuals to institute cases directly before the Court only if the respondent State has deposited such a declaration. The Court confirmed with the African Union Commission that Sudan has not made this declaration. Therefore, the Court cannot receive or examine the application, and it must be struck out from…

  • Jurisdiction Of Regional Courts
  • Individual Access To Court
  • Declarations Under Protocol
  • Admissibility Requirements
Read case analysis
Public International Law [2011] AfCHPR 39

Amare and Another v Republic of Mozambique and Another (Application 5 of 2011)

Amare and Another v Republic of Mozambique and Another (Application 5 of 2011) [2011] AfCHPR 39 (16 June 2011)

The African Court held it lacked jurisdiction over an individual application against Mozambique because Mozambique had not accepted direct individual access under Article 34(6).

  • Jurisdiction Of Regional Courts
  • Individual Access To Court
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Jurisdiction
  • Individual-access
  • African-court-on-human-and-peoples-rights
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.