Share
Munyandilikirwa v Republic of Rwanda (Order) (Application 023/2015) [2016] AfCHPR 66 (3 June 2016)
- Citation
- [2016] AfCHPR 66
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Ramadhani P
- Case number
- Application 023/2015
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Ramadhani P
- Case number
- Application 023/2015
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court held that the withdrawal by the Republic of Rwanda of its declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol does not affect the admissibility or continuation of applications already filed before the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Court reasoned that the withdrawal cannot have retroactive effect and does not suspend or terminate proceedings in cases that were instituted prior to the withdrawal. This position is consistent with the Court's earlier ruling in Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v Republic of Rwanda, Application No 003/2014, where it was unanimously decided that the withdrawal of Rwanda's declaration did not affect pending cases. Accordingly, the Court decided to continue examining the present application.
Court disposition
Application to suspend proceedings denied; Court will continue examining the application.
Orders
- The Court unanimously decides to continue examining this Application.
02
Material facts
Parties
Laurent Munyandilikirwa
ApplicantRepublic of Rwanda
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Application / Interlocutory Order on Effect of Respondent's Withdrawal of Declaration Under Article 34(6)
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the withdrawal by the Republic of Rwanda of its declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol affects pending applications before the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights.
- 02
Whether proceedings in cases already filed against Rwanda should be suspended following the withdrawal.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant contends that the withdrawal of Rwanda's declaration under Article 34(6) should not affect pending cases, as the withdrawal cannot have retroactive effect and should not prejudice applications already before the Court.
- Respondent
- The respondent argues that following its withdrawal of the declaration under Article 34(6), the Court should suspend all hearings involving Rwanda, including the present application, until further notice and review of the declaration.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights, Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v Republic of Rwanda, Application No 003/2014, Ruling of 3 June 2016.
Withdrawal of a declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol does not have retroactive effect on applications already filed before the Court.
- 02
Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights, Article 34(6).
Jurisdiction of the Court over applications is determined at the time of filing, and subsequent withdrawal of a declaration does not affect pending proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court held that the withdrawal by the Republic of Rwanda of its declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol does not affect the admissibility or continuation of applications already filed before the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Court reasoned that the withdrawal cannot have retroactive effect and does not suspend or terminate proceedings in cases that were instituted prior to the withdrawal. This position is consistent with the Court's earlier ruling in Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v Republic of Rwanda, Application No 003/2014, where it was unanimously decided that the withdrawal of Rwanda's declaration did not affect pending cases. Accordingly, the Court decided to continue examining the present application.
Obiter and limits
- The Court notes that the withdrawal of a declaration under Article 34(6) is a sovereign act, but its effect is prospective and does not prejudice cases already before the Court.
- The Court reiterates its commitment to ensuring access to justice for individuals and non-governmental organisations as provided under the Protocol.
Court disposition
Application to suspend proceedings denied; Court will continue examining the application.
- The Court unanimously decides to continue examining this Application.
Source and reliance status
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Judgment
AFRICAN UNION
الأتحاد الأفريقي
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH UNION AFRICAINE UNIÃO AFRICANA
AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ET DES PEUPLES
IN THE MATTER OF
LAURENT MUNYANDILIKIRWA
$V$ .
REPUBLIC OF RWANDA
APPLICATION NO 023/2015

Page 1 of 5
The Court composed of: Augustino S. L. RAMADHANI, President, Elsie N. THOMPSON, Vice-President; Gérard NIYUNGEKO, Fatsah OUGUERGOUZ, Duncan TAMBALA, Sylvain ORÉ, El Hadji GUISSÉ, Ben KIOKO, Rafâa BEN ACHOUR, Solomy B. BOSSA, Angelo V. MATUSSE, Judges; and Robert ENO, Registrar,
In the matter of;
LAURENT MUNYANDILIKIRWA V. REPUBLIC OF RWANDA;
After deliberations,
Makes the following Order:
I. Parties
- 1. The Court received, on 23 September 2015, an Application by Laurent Munyandilikirwa, (hereinafter referred to as "the Applicant"), instituting proceedings against the Republic of Rwanda, (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent"). - 2. The Respondent ratified the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter, referred to as "the Charter") on 22 July 1983, and the Protocol to the Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Protocol") on 6 June 2003; and deposited the declaration accepting the competence of the Court to receive cases from individuals and non-governmental organisations, in accordance with Article 34(6) of the Protocol, on 22 June 2013.
Page 2 of 5
II. Subject of the Order
3. By a letter dated 1 March 2016, received at the Registry of the Court on 2 March 2016, the Respondent notified the Court of its deposition of an instrument of withdrawal of its Declaration made under Article 34(6) of the Protocol. The letter further stated that:
> "The Republic of Rwanda requests that after deposition of the same, the Court suspends hearings involving the Republic of Rwanda, including the case referred above, until review is made to the Declaration and the Court is notified in due course."
- 4. By a letter dated 3 March 2016, the Office of Legal Counsel and Directorate of Legal Affairs of the African Union Commission notified the Court of the submission of the Respondent's instrument of withdrawal of its Declaration made under Article 34(6) of the Protocol, which was received at the African Union Commission on 29 February 2016. - 5. When the Court received the Respondent's instrument of withdrawal, it had already set down a public hearing for 4 March 2016 in respect of Application No 003/2014, Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v Republic of Rwanda. - 6. Following the Public Hearing, on 18 March 2016, the Court issued an Order in which it:
"i. Orders that the Parties file written submissions on the effect of the Respondent's withdrawal of its Declaration made under Article 34(6) of the Protocol, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of this Order
ii. Decides that its ruling on the effect of the Respondent's withdrawal of its Declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol shall be handed down at a date to be duly notified to the Parties.
iii. Orders the Applicant to file written submissions on the procedural matters stated in paragraph 15 above, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of this Order".
7. Following the orders in paragraph 6 above, the Court decided to adjourn all cases filed against Rwanda, pending its ruling on the effect of the Respondent's withdrawal.
III. Effects of withdrawal of Declaration
- 8. In a Ruling issued on 3 June 2016 in Application *No 003/2014*, *Ingabire Victoire* Umuhoza v Republic of Rwanda, the Court unanimously ruled that the Respondent's withdrawal of its declaration has no effect on the Application, and so it decided to continue with the hearing of the Application. - 9. The Court's Ruling in *Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v Republic of Rwanda*, therefore, is to the effect that the withdrawal of Rwanda's Declaration does not have the effect of suspending proceedings of cases that have been filed against Rwanda before the Court.
10. For these reasons;
THE COURT, unanimously, decides to continue examining this Application.
Signed:
amar
Augustino S. L. RAMADHANI, President
Robert ENO, Registrar
Done at Arusha, this 3 Day of June 2016, in English and French, the English version being authoritative.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.