Namatovu v Bukenya (Miscellaneous Application 2870 of 2024) [2024] UGHCLD 291 (9 December 2024)
Court
HC: Land Division (Uganda)
Case number
Miscellaneous Application 2870 of 2024
Judge
Naluzze Aisha Batala, J
The High Court declined to strike out a plaint alleging blocked access to kibanja land, holding that the cause of action issue needed evidence at trial.
Uganda v Okabo and 2 Others (Criminal Case 30 of 2017) [2022] UGHCCRD 56 (28 September 2022)
Court
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Case number
Criminal Case 30 of 2017
Judge
Byaruhanga Rugyema, J
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons. The evidence presented was insufficient to prove the essential ingredients of aggravated robbery, as the victim did not testify, no community members who arrested the accused were called as witnesses, and none of the alleged stolen properties were exhibited in court. Without direct or circumstantial evidence placing the accused at the scene or linking them to the offence, the court held that no reasonable tribunal could convict on the evidence adduced. Consequently, the accused persons wer…
Uganda v Kabasomi & Ors (HCT-01-CR-SC-0193 OF 2016.) [2018] UGHCCRD 134 (4 May 2018)
Court
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Case number
HCT-01-CR-SC-0193 OF 2016.
Judge
Masalu Musene, J
The High Court of Uganda at Fort Portal held that the prosecution had not proved participation in a murder charge and acquitted all three accused at no-case-to-answer stage.
Mpuugu and Sons Transporters Limited v Attorney General and Another (Civil Appeal 63 of 1999) [2001] UGCA 27 (27 April 2001)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Civil Appeal 63 of 1999
Judge
kato ,JA, Engwau, JA, Twinomujuni, JA
The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge did not err in referring to the report (ID1) as it was only relevant to the viability of the route, which was abandoned as a ground of appeal. The judge's reliance on Article 126(2)(e) of the Constitution to justify the unsigned document was improper, but no miscarriage of justice occurred. The interests of the appellant were considered by the Transport Licensing Board as required by Section 91(2)(e) of the Traffic and Road Safety Act, and the appellant was invited to meetings regarding the licence but failed to attend. There was no evidence of fr…
uganda v no. 40709 sgt Mukerege and another (Criminal Session Case 346 of 1991) [1993] UGHC 73 (7 December 1993)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Session Case 346 of 1991
Judge
Kireju, J
The High Court of Uganda upheld a no case to answer submission and acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution evidence did not link him to murder, robbery, or attempted murder.
Uganda v Alou Kawa (Criminal Revision No. 4-1/90) [1990] UGIC 1 (3 December 1990)
Court
Industrial Court of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Revision No. 4-1/90
Judge
Okello, J
The court quashed convictions for imputation of witchcraft, finding the evidence did not prove the offence charged and that the sentence was improperly imposed.
Rex v Nura (Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 1949) [1949] EACA 45 (1 January 1949)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 1949
Judge
Edwards CJ, Graham Paul CJ, Sinclair J
The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa quashed a manslaughter conviction, holding the evidence did not prove gross negligence or that the appellant caused the collision.
Rex v Shija (Criminal Appeal No. 50 of 1945) [1945] EACA 17 (1 January 1945)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 50 of 1945
Judge
Gray CJ, Manning J, Sheridan CJ
The conviction for manslaughter was set aside because the trial judge failed to comply with Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, did not base his finding on evidence presented at trial, and relied on an alleged fact unsupported by the record. The defence witnesses were not challenged or cross-examined by the prosecution, undermining the reliability of the prosecution's case. The assessors believed the appellant's brother was responsible, and the record was insufficient to support the conviction. The appellate court held that, in the absence of proper evidentiary support and procedural…