Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] UGHCLD 291

Namatovu v Bukenya

Namatovu v Bukenya (Miscellaneous Application 2870 of 2024) [2024] UGHCLD 291 (9 December 2024)

The High Court declined to strike out a plaint alleging blocked access to kibanja land, holding that the cause of action issue needed evidence at trial.

  • Striking Out Plaint
  • Cause Of Action
  • Land Ownership Dispute
  • Access Rights
  • Pleadings
  • Evidentiary Requirements
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2022] UGHCCRD 56

Uganda v Okabo and 2 Others

Uganda v Okabo and 2 Others (Criminal Case 30 of 2017) [2022] UGHCCRD 56 (28 September 2022)

The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons. The evidence presented was insufficient to prove the essential ingredients of aggravated robbery, as the victim did not testify, no community members who arrested the accused were called as witnesses, and none of the alleged stolen properties were exhibited in court. Without direct or circumstantial evidence placing the accused at the scene or linking them to the offence, the court held that no reasonable tribunal could convict on the evidence adduced. Consequently, the accused persons wer…

  • Aggravated Robbery
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Evidentiary Requirements
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] UGHCCRD 134

Uganda v Kabasomi & Ors (HCT-01-CR-SC-0193 OF 2016.)

Uganda v Kabasomi & Ors (HCT-01-CR-SC-0193 OF 2016.) [2018] UGHCCRD 134 (4 May 2018)

The High Court of Uganda at Fort Portal held that the prosecution had not proved participation in a murder charge and acquitted all three accused at no-case-to-answer stage.

  • Murder
  • Standard Of Proof
  • No Case To Answer
  • Aiding And Abetting
  • Evidentiary Requirements
  • No-case-to-answer
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2001] UGCA 27

Mpuugu and Sons Transporters Limited v Attorney General and Another

Mpuugu and Sons Transporters Limited v Attorney General and Another (Civil Appeal 63 of 1999) [2001] UGCA 27 (27 April 2001)

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge did not err in referring to the report (ID1) as it was only relevant to the viability of the route, which was abandoned as a ground of appeal. The judge's reliance on Article 126(2)(e) of the Constitution to justify the unsigned document was improper, but no miscarriage of justice occurred. The interests of the appellant were considered by the Transport Licensing Board as required by Section 91(2)(e) of the Traffic and Road Safety Act, and the appellant was invited to meetings regarding the licence but failed to attend. There was no evidence of fr…

  • Licensing Disputes
  • Transport Regulation
  • Judicial Review
  • Evidentiary Requirements
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1993] UGHC 73

uganda v no. 40709 sgt Mukerege and another

uganda v no. 40709 sgt Mukerege and another (Criminal Session Case 346 of 1991) [1993] UGHC 73 (7 December 1993)

The High Court of Uganda upheld a no case to answer submission and acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution evidence did not link him to murder, robbery, or attempted murder.

  • Murder
  • Robbery
  • Attempted Murder
  • No Case To Answer
  • Evidentiary Requirements
  • No-case-to-answer
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1991] UGHC 79

Uganda v Celina Aguti

Uganda v Celina Aguti (Criminal Case No. 97 of 1988) [1991] UGHC 79 (20 August 1991)

The High Court quashed witchcraft convictions against Celina Aguti, finding the evidence insufficient and setting aside consecutive sentences.

  • Witchcraft Offences
  • Evidentiary Requirements
  • Conviction Standards
  • Criminal-law
  • Witchcraft-offences
  • Evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1991] UGHC 85

Uganda v Yubentino Olinga

Uganda v Yubentino Olinga (Criminal Revision Order No. 97/91) [1991] UGHC 85 (6 August 1991)

The High Court quashed convictions under the Witchcraft Act for lack of proof required by statute and set aside the consecutive sentences.

  • Witchcraft Offences
  • Evidentiary Requirements
  • Statutory Compliance
  • Witchcraft-offences
  • Criminal-revision
  • Evidentiary-requirements
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1990] UGIC 1

Uganda v Alou Kawa

Uganda v Alou Kawa (Criminal Revision No. 4-1/90) [1990] UGIC 1 (3 December 1990)

The court quashed convictions for imputation of witchcraft, finding the evidence did not prove the offence charged and that the sentence was improperly imposed.

  • Witchcraft Offences
  • Imputation Of Witchcraft
  • Evidentiary Requirements
  • Omnibus Sentence
  • Revision Of Conviction
  • Witchcraft-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1949] EACA 45

Rex v Nura

Rex v Nura (Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 1949) [1949] EACA 45 (1 January 1949)

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa quashed a manslaughter conviction, holding the evidence did not prove gross negligence or that the appellant caused the collision.

  • Manslaughter By Negligence
  • Culpable Omission
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents
  • Standard Of Proof
  • Evidentiary Requirements
  • Manslaughter-by-negligence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1945] EACA 17

Rex v Shija

Rex v Shija (Criminal Appeal No. 50 of 1945) [1945] EACA 17 (1 January 1945)

The conviction for manslaughter was set aside because the trial judge failed to comply with Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, did not base his finding on evidence presented at trial, and relied on an alleged fact unsupported by the record. The defence witnesses were not challenged or cross-examined by the prosecution, undermining the reliability of the prosecution's case. The assessors believed the appellant's brother was responsible, and the record was insufficient to support the conviction. The appellate court held that, in the absence of proper evidentiary support and procedural…

  • Manslaughter
  • Evidentiary Requirements
  • Cross Examination
  • Judicial Practice
  • Assessment Of Witness Credibility
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.