Dr. Kamba Baleke v Attorney General and Another
Dr. Kamba Baleke v Attorney General and Another (Constitutional Petition No. 2 of 2014) [2021] UGCC 5 (27 April 2021)
The Constitutional Court found that the petition did not raise any question for constitutional interpretation as required under Article 137 of the Constitution. The acts and omissions complained of by the petitioner, including the endorsement of the charge sheet, the conduct of concurrent trials, and the inclusion of alternative charges, were matters of enforcement and procedural regularity that fall within the jurisdiction of the High Court and not the Constitutional Court. The law permits alternative charges in indictments if they are founded on the same facts, and any errors or inconsisten…
Source excerpt
- Constitutional Interpretation
- Jurisdiction Of Constitutional Court
- Role Of Dpp
- Criminal Trial Procedure
- Double Jeopardy
- Enforcement Of Rights