Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] UGHC 992

Ditai & 3 Others v Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAFRI) & 6 Others

Ditai & 3 Others v Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAFRI) & 6 Others (Miscellaneous Application 422 of 2023) [2024] UGHC 992 (22 October 2024)

The High Court refused review of a prior injunction ruling, holding the applicants were not aggrieved persons and that no new evidence justifying review was shown.

  • Review Of Court Orders
  • Temporary Injunctions
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Corporate Personality
  • Error On Face Of Record
  • Review-of-court-orders
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2024] UGHCLD 85

Kagoro Epimac v Samalien Properties Limited & 4 Others

Kagoro Epimac v Samalien Properties Limited & 4 Others (Miscellaneous Application 117 of 2023) [2024] UGHCLD 85 (28 March 2024)

The High Court lifted the corporate veil over respondent companies after finding that assets were transferred after judgment to defeat execution of a UGX 1.17 billion decree.

  • Lifting Corporate Veil
  • Fraudulent Conveyance
  • Execution Of Judgment
  • Director Liability
  • Corporate Personality
  • Piercing Corporate Veil
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2023] UGHCLD 141

Ntinda Industrial Estate Development Association Limited v Kampala General Furnishing Limited

Ntinda Industrial Estate Development Association Limited v Kampala General Furnishing Limited (Miscellaneous Application 424 of 2021) [2023] UGHCLD 141 (31 May 2023)

The High Court struck out a plaint brought by a shareholder against a company because the claim should have been brought by petition under the Companies Act.

  • Company Law
  • Corporate Personality
  • Derivative Actions
  • Unfair Prejudice
  • Procedural Irregularity
  • Company-law
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] UGHCCD 266

Mpondwa Cross Boarders Traders Cooperatives Society Limited v Isango Subcounty Local Government

Mpondwa Cross Boarders Traders Cooperatives Society Limited v Isango Subcounty Local Government (Miscellaneous Application No. 106 of 2022) [2022] UGHCCD 266 (16 November 2022)

The court found that while the respondent's naming was a misnomer, it did not render the entity fictitious or incapable of suing, as the sub-county council exists and is recognised under the Local Governments Act. However, the respondent failed to prove exclusive possession of the suit land, which is registered in the names of Kasese District Local Government, and thus did not disclose a reasonable cause of action for trespass. The hurried creation of the Isango cattle market was irregular and intended to frustrate the district's revenue collection and the applicant's contract. The commenceme…

  • Local Government Councils
  • Public Procurement Compliance
  • Trespass To Land
  • Market Establishment Authority
  • Corporate Personality
  • Council Resolution Requirements
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2022] UGHC 10

Uganda Muslim Welfare Association v Saudi Marble Co Ltd

Uganda Muslim Welfare Association v Saudi Marble Co Ltd (Civil Suit No. 63 of 2006) [2022] UGHC 10 (22 March 2022)

The High Court dismissed a trespass claim over forest land, holding that the plaintiff lacked legal capacity and had no proven right or lawful possession.

  • Trespass To Land
  • Corporate Personality
  • Capacity To Sue
  • Donation Of Land
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Trespass-to-land
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2021] UGCA 220

Paramal Patel and 2 Others v Uganda Medium Industries Limited

Paramal Patel and 2 Others v Uganda Medium Industries Limited (Civil Appeal 268 of 2018) [2021] UGCA 220 (28 October 2021)

The Court of Appeal found that Uganda Medium Industries Ltd was the lawful tenant of the premises, not Edirisa Karenget Musiwa personally. The evidence, including rent receipts and correspondence, established the respondent's tenancy. The company, as a registered legal entity, could own property and enter into tenancy agreements. The actions of the appellants—locking the premises and taking property in distress for rent—were unlawful and in contravention of the Distress for Rent (Bailiffs) Act, as the 2nd appellant lacked the required certificate. The damages suffered by the respondent were c…

  • Landlord Tenant Disputes
  • Distress For Rent
  • Agency Liability
  • Special And General Damages
  • Corporate Personality
  • Joint And Several Liability
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2021] UGHCCD 10

Rutayisire and Anor v Uganda Revenue Authority

Rutayisire and Anor v Uganda Revenue Authority (Miscellaneous Cause No. 236 of 2020) [2021] UGHCCD 10 (19 March 2021)

The High Court quashed the prosecution of two company officers, finding the decision irrational, procedurally improper, and an abuse of process.

  • Judicial Review
  • Prosecutorial Discretion
  • Corporate Criminal Liability
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Abuse Of Process
  • Corporate Personality
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2021] UGHCCD 15

Rutayisire Alphonse and Anor V Uganda Revenue Authourity (The Commissioner Customs)

Rutayisire Alphonse and Anor V Uganda Revenue Authourity (The Commissioner Customs) (Miscellaneous Cause No. 236 of 2020) [2021] UGHCCD 15 (19 March 2021)

The court found that the Respondent's decision to prosecute the Applicants, who were not present in Uganda at the time of the alleged offences and were not directly involved in the acts complained of, was irrational, procedurally improper, and an abuse of due process. The Respondent failed to provide evidence justifying the charges against the Applicants, ignored the principle of corporate personality, and did not follow statutory procedures for prosecuting companies. The court held that criminal liability should not be imputed to directors or managers absent direct involvement or evidence of…

  • Judicial Review
  • Prosecutorial Discretion
  • Corporate Personality
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Irrationality
  • Abuse Of Process
Read case analysis
Employment And Labour [2021] UGIC 4

KCB Bank (U) Limited v Kabajulizi (Labour Dispute Appeal No. 16 of 2019)

KCB Bank (U) Limited v Kabajulizi (Labour Dispute Appeal No. 16 of 2019) [2021] UGIC 4 (22 January 2021)

The Industrial Court held that the appellant’s name was only misdescribed in the decree, so the appeal was not invalid and the preliminary objection failed.

  • Misnomer In Pleadings
  • Corporate Personality
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Labour Termination Dispute
  • Misnomer-in-pleadings
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] UGCommC 34

Mutebi v Nam Chhau Trading Co Ltd

Mutebi v Nam Chhau Trading Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 4 of 2020) [2020] UGCommC 34 (16 October 2020)

The court found that the respondent's deponent had locus standi as there was no timely or substantive challenge to his directorship, and that the absence of attached proof was not fatal in the circumstances. The court held that the plaint disclosed a cause of action against the applicant, as the pleadings and evidence, including a personal written commitment by the applicant, supported the respondent's claim. The court determined that the suit was not frivolous or vexatious; the failure to attach a certificate of incorporation or the misdescription of parties did not render the suit defective…

  • Cause Of Action
  • Corporate Personality
  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Frivolous And Vexatious Suits
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.