Kiggundu v Kamoga and Another (MISC. CAUSE NO. 0118 OF 2024)
Kiggundu v Kamoga and Another (MISC. CAUSE NO. 0118 OF 2024) [2025] UGHC 168 (22 January 2025)
The court found that the 1st Respondent failed to demonstrate a caveatable interest in the suit land at the time of lodging the caveat. The only evidence presented was a deed of donation from 1983, with no substantiation of tenancy by occupancy or proof of adverse interest. The Respondent did not provide evidence of destruction of crops or compensation, nor did he establish a proprietary or quasi-proprietary claim. The court held that limitation issues could not be determined in this application, as they pertain to suits for recovery of land, not caveat applications. The preliminary objection…
Source excerpt
- Caveats On Land
- Limitation Periods
- Tenancy By Occupancy
- Powers Of Attorney
- Compensation For Wrongful Caveat