Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kyeyune v Tropical Bank Limited (Miscellaneous Application 308 of 2022) [2023] UGHC 65 (30 August 2023)
The High Court found Tropical Bank Limited in contempt for failing to comply with a prior order to file readable loan documents, and awarded a fine, damages, and costs.
Ham Enterprises Limited and 2 Others v Diamond Trust Bank Uganda Limited and Another (Miscellaneous Application 143 of 2021) [2021] UGCA 206 (18 November 2021)
The Court of Appeal partially stayed execution of its retrial order pending a Supreme Court appeal, but not its self-executing order setting aside the High Court judgment.
Jing Hong and Another v Barclays Bank of Uganda Limited (Civil Appeal 135 of 2012) [2021] UGCA 214 (22 July 2021)
The Court of Appeal held that the doctrine of res judicata did not bar HCCS No.35 of 2009. The court found that the parties in the two suits were not the same: HCCS No.156 of 2008 was between Jinda International Textiles Corporation Ltd (the borrower) and Barclays Bank & Andrew Kasirye, while HCCS No.35 of 2009 was between Barclays Bank and the appellants as guarantors. The appellants, though directors/shareholders in the borrower, guaranteed the loan in their individual capacities, making them distinct parties from the corporate entity. The causes of action were also different: the first sui…
Source excerpt
United Bank for Africa (U) Limited v Mody Nouhou Barry (Civil Appeal No. 163 of 2016) [2016] UGCA 99 (13 December 2016)
The Court of Appeal of Uganda allowed the parties’ consent withdrawal of the appeal and ordered each side to bear its own costs.
Muddu Awulira Enterprises Ltd & 2 Ors v Stanbic Bank Uganda Ltd (HCT - 00 - CC - MA - 528 (HCT-00-CC-MA 528 of 2010) [2010] UGCommC 26 (19 October 2010)
The High Court allowed an application to amend a plaint in a banking dispute, finding the changes arose from the same cause of action and caused no unfair prejudice.
Standard Chartered Bank Uganda Ltd v Gapco Uganda Ltd & Anor (HCT-00-CC-MA 49 of 2007) [2007] UGCommC 41 (24 April 2007)
The High Court held that interpleader could not proceed because the disputed funds were not the same subject matter as the pending suit and the bank had an interest in them.
