Download

Uganda Judgment

Court of Appeal of Uganda

United Bank for Africa (U) Limited v Mody Nouhou Barry (Civil Appeal No. 163 of 2016) [2016] UGCA 99 (13 December 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court, upon being satisfied that both parties have entered into a consent settlement agreement and have jointly applied for withdrawal of the appeal, finds that there is no longer a dispute requiring adjudication. The withdrawal is allowed by consent, and in accordance with the agreement, each party is to bear its own costs. The court recognizes the autonomy of parties to settle their disputes and respects the terms mutually agreed upon, provided they do not contravene any law or public policy. The operative orders are made in line with the parties' consent and the applicable procedural rules.

Court disposition

Appeal withdrawn by consent; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Civil Appeal No. 163 of 2016 is withdrawn by consent of the parties.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs of the appeal.

02

Material facts

Parties

United Bank for Africa (U) Limited

Appellant Counsel: Raymond Aruho & Co. Advocates

Mody Nouhou Barry

Respondent Counsel: Kampala Associated Advocates

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Appeal / Withdrawal by Consent

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant and respondent have reached a consent settlement agreement and jointly request withdrawal of the appeal with each party bearing its own costs.
Respondent
The respondent agrees to the terms of the consent settlement and supports withdrawal of the appeal with no order as to costs.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Civil Procedure Rules, Order 43

    A civil appeal may be withdrawn by consent of the parties, subject to court approval.

  2. 02

    Civil Procedure Act, Section 27

    Costs may be determined by agreement of the parties or by the court upon withdrawal of proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court, upon being satisfied that both parties have entered into a consent settlement agreement and have jointly applied for withdrawal of the appeal, finds that there is no longer a dispute requiring adjudication. The withdrawal is allowed by consent, and in accordance with the agreement, each party is to bear its own costs. The court recognizes the autonomy of parties to settle their disputes and respects the terms mutually agreed upon, provided they do not contravene any law or public policy. The operative orders are made in line with the parties' consent and the applicable procedural rules.

Court disposition

Appeal withdrawn by consent; no order as to costs.

  • Civil Appeal No. 163 of 2016 is withdrawn by consent of the parties.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs of the appeal.

Source and reliance status

Court of Appeal of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court of Appeal of Uganda

Judgment

[2016] UGCA 99

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2016

UNITED BANK FOR AFRICA (U) LIMITED....................................

VERSUS

RESPONDENT MODY NOUHOU BARRY......

[Appeal from the Judgment and Orders of the High Court at Kampala in Civil Suit No. 19 of 2012 (Hon. Justice Benjamin Kabiito) dated 7<sup>th</sup> December 2015]

CONSENT WITHDRAW ORDER

By Consent of the parties to this Appeal on the 9<sup>th</sup> day of December 2016, pursuant to the parties' Consent Settlement Agreement specifying the terms of their settlement and a copy of which has been filed on the Court's record:

IT is ORDERED as follows:-

- 1. By Consent of the Appellant and Respondent, Civil Appeal No. 163 of 2016 is hereby withdrawn. - 2. Each party bears its own costs of the Appeal

Head of Legal for the Appellant Managing Director/CEO of Appellant Aruho Raymond Advocate Immissioner For Oaths In the presence of... Counsel for the Appellant $-4$ Advocates M-3650 Mody Nouhou Barry Kampala Associated Advocates Counsel for the Respondent Respondent GIVEN Under my Hand and Seal of this Hon. Court this.................................... $\therefore$ day of es pai EIPT NO.

Jointly drawn by:

Raymond Aruho & Co. Advocates

Suite R.10, 5th Floor, Namaganda Plaza, Plot 14, Luwum Street, P. O Box 33895, KAMPALA

Kamapala Associated Advocates

KAA House, Plot 14 Nakasero Road, P. O. Box 9566, KAMPALA

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Rules, Order 43

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Act, Section 27

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.