JurisAssist Uganda Case Law
Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter Uganda case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2021] ACHPR 4

Miles Investments & 2 Others v. Republic of Sierra Leone (Communication 623 of 2016)

Miles Investments & 2 Others v. Republic of Sierra Leone (Communication 623 of 2016) [2021] ACHPR 4 (17 April 2021)

Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Case number
Communication 623 of 2016

The African Commission struck out this communication against Sierra Leone for want of diligent prosecution after the complainants failed to file admissibility submissions despite reminders and extra time.

  • Admissibility Of Communication
  • Right To Property
  • Due Process
  • State Land Lease
  • Diligent Prosecution
  • Diligent-prosecution
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1994] ACHPR 3

Diawara v Benin (Communication 18 of 1988)

Diawara v Benin (Communication 18 of 1988) [1994] ACHPR 3 (3 November 1994)

Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Case number
Communication 18 of 1988

The African Commission held the communication inadmissible because the complainant had not exhausted local remedies; the matter was still pending in Benin.

  • Arbitrary Detention
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Admissibility Of Communication
  • Exhaustion-of-local-remedies
  • Admissibility-of-communication
  • Arbitrary-detention
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1990] ACHPR 9

Civil Liberties Organization v Nigeria (Communication No. 045/1990)

Civil Liberties Organization v Nigeria (Communication No. 045/1990) [1990] ACHPR 9 (4 October 1990)

Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Case number
Communication No. 045/1990

The African Commission declared this communication inadmissible because Civil Liberties Organization had not exhausted local remedies before bringing the case.

  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Admissibility Of Communication
  • Human Rights Protection
  • Exhaustion-of-local-remedies
  • Communication-admissibility
  • African-charter
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [1988] ACHPR 3

Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers v Yugoslavia (Communication 3 of 1988)

Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers v Yugoslavia (Communication 3 of 1988) [1988] ACHPR 3 (26 October 1988)

Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Case number
Communication 3 of 1988

The African Commission declared a communication inadmissible because it was directed against Yugoslavia, which was not a party to the African Charter.

  • Right To Practice Profession
  • Admissibility Of Communication
  • Admissibility
  • Human-rights-commission-procedure
  • Right-to-practice-profession
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.