Share
Uganda v Sekabito Kassim (Criminal Case No. 178 of 2003) [2004] UGHC 10 (9 March 2004)
- Citation
- [2004] UGHC 10
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Criminal Trial / Judgment
- Case number
- Criminal Case No. 178 of 2003
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Criminal Trial / Judgment
- Case number
- Criminal Case No. 178 of 2003
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the complainant was below the age of 18, based on her mother's testimony and her school attendance. The evidence of the complainant, her mother, and the LC1 secretary for defence established that the accused had carnal knowledge of the complainant. The accused was properly identified, and the absence of medical evidence did not undermine the prosecution's case due to the corroborative testimonies. The court held that conviction could be based on the uncorroborated evidence of a single witness if the possibility of mistaken identity was ruled out. The accused was found guilty of defilement and sentenced to 12 years imprisonment, taking into account his status as a first offender and the time spent on remand.
Court disposition
conviction_and_sentence
Orders
- Accused is convicted of defilement as charged.
- Accused is sentenced to 12 years imprisonment.
- Judgment and sentence read in open court; counsel may appeal.
02
Material facts
Parties
Uganda
ApplicantSekabito Kassim
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Sentence Length Years: 12
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Trial / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the complainant was below the age of 18 years at the time of the alleged offence.
- 02
Whether there was carnal knowledge of the complainant by the accused.
- 03
Whether the accused was properly identified as the perpetrator of the offence.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The prosecution argued that the complainant was 14 years old, as confirmed by her mother and her school attendance. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the complainant, her mother, and the LC1 secretary for defence to establish that the accused had carnal knowledge of the complainant. The prosecution asserted that the accused was properly identified and that the absence of medical evidence did not preclude conviction, given the corroborative testimonies.
- Respondent
- The accused denied committing the offence and suggested that his prior relationship with the complainant's mother motivated her to have him arrested out of anger. He claimed to be a first offender and requested a lenient sentence, citing his time on remand and his responsibilities as a parent.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Uganda v Nicholas Okello (1984) HCB 22
Evidence of any of the parents is sufficient to prove the age of the complainant in defilement cases.
- 02
Uganda v Musese & Anor (1982) HCB 72
Conviction can be based on the uncorroborated evidence of a single witness if the trial court is satisfied that the possibility of mistaken identity is ruled out.
- 03
Ellis v R 1965 EA
Courts may act in the absence of medical evidence if other available evidence supports the conclusion.
- 04
Uganda v Joseph Mulindwa 1975 HCB 206
It is useful to prove that the accused knew the complainant was under the age of 14 years in defilement cases.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the complainant was below the age of 18, based on her mother's testimony and her school attendance. The evidence of the complainant, her mother, and the LC1 secretary for defence established that the accused had carnal knowledge of the complainant. The accused was properly identified, and the absence of medical evidence did not undermine the prosecution's case due to the corroborative testimonies. The court held that conviction could be based on the uncorroborated evidence of a single witness if the possibility of mistaken identity was ruled out. The accused was found guilty of defilement and sentenced to 12 years imprisonment, taking into account his status as a first offender and the time spent on remand.
Obiter and limits
- Defilement is a very serious offence, especially when it involves a child of school-going age.
- The court must protect victims in such cases by imposing deterrent sentences.
- Medical evidence is helpful but not indispensable if other evidence is sufficient.
Court disposition
conviction_and_sentence
- Accused is convicted of defilement as charged.
- Accused is sentenced to 12 years imprisonment.
- Judgment and sentence read in open court; counsel may appeal.
Source and reliance status
High Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court of Uganda
Judgment
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f1\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial;} {\f40\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f41\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f43\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f44\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;} {\f45\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f46\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f47\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f48\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);} {\f50\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f51\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Cyr;}{\f53\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek;}{\f54\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Tur;}{\f55\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial (Hebrew);} {\f56\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial (Arabic);}{\f57\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}{\f58\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial
(Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0; \red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128; \red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{ \s1\ql \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 1;}{ \s2\qc \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel1\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 2;}{ \s3\ql \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 3;}{\s4\qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1 \keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel3\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 4;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph
Font;}{\* \ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\qj \li720\ri0\sl360\slmult1 \widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0 \f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Body Text Indent;}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 footer;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}{\*\cs18 \additive \sbasedon10 line number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid10512721}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author Typings}{\operator owner}{\creatim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr12\min49}{\revtim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr12\min49} {\printim\yr2004\mo6\dy25\hr9\min55}{\version2}{\edmins0}{\nofpages5}{\nofwords786}{\nofchars4485}{\*\company Acer
Customer}{\nofcharsws5261}{\vern24689}} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nojkernpunct\rsidroot10512721 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10512721 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10512721 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10512721 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10512721 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \psz1\linemod5\linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s16\ql
\li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxc\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs17\insrsid10512721 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs17\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid10512721 1}}}{\cs17\insrsid10512721 \par }\pard \s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid10512721 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s1\qc \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid10512721 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par }\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \par IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \par \par CRIMINAL CASE NO. 178 OF 2003 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \par }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \par UGANDA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PROSECUTOR \par \par }\pard\plain \s2\qc \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel1\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid10512721 VERSUS \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \par SEKABITO KASSIM ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ACCUSED \par \par }\pard\plain \s3\ql \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10512721 BEFORE: }{\ul\insrsid10512721 THE HON. MR. JUSTICE R. O. OKUMU WENGI \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f1\fs28\ul\insrsid10512721 \par \par }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 JUDGMENT: \par }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \par
}\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Accused, a neighbour was indicted with defilement of a girl in April 2002. It is alleged that on 1}{\f1\fs28\super\insrsid10512721 st }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 April 2002 at Bubajwe Zone Kawempe Sekabito Kassim defiled Nasuna Nuriat. He denied committing the offence. During the trial Prosecution called 3 witnesses. The accused made a sworn testimony. \par \par The ingredients of the offence of defilement are that (a) the girls must be below the age of 18(b) that there was carnal knowledge (c) that t he accused committed the offence. In this case the girl herself told court that she was in primary 5 at Blessed Child Primary School. Other than this she did not say what her age was. However her mother Juliet Nabada, told court that the girl was 14 ye a rs old and also that she is in Primary 5. She stated in Cross Examination that Nasuna was born in 1990. This would make her 14 this year. From this evidence and looking at the girl as she testified I am able to say and find that she is 14 years old and in any case she is quite below the age of 18. In any case the accused who testified on oath was aware that the child was bellow 18. He said:- \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0
{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \'93I know her. She is a child of my Neighbour\'85 Nassuna goes to school at Blessed Child\'94. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \par In defilement cases it is always useful to prove the fact that the accused knew that the complainant was under [14] years of age. }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Uganda Vs Joseph Mulindwa}{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 1975 HCB 206. evidence of any of the parents will be sufficient to prove age of the girl: }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Uganda Vs}{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Nicholas Okello}{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 (1984) HCB. 22. \par \par On the second issue namely if there was carnal knowledge there is the evidence of the girl herself who narrated how the accused whom she knew and identified in broad daylight took sexual advantage of her. Her mother (PW3) then told this cour t of the way the girl reacted when asked to serve food to the accused. \par }\pard\plain \s15\qj \li720\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0 \f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10512721 The child refused to serve Kassim with the food. She even entered the house and jammed.\'94 \par }\pard\plain \qj
\li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \par From this reaction the mother smelt a rat. The girl then broke out the story and told the mo ther of her having been defiled by Kassim. She reported the matter to Mr Kinene who testified as PW3. Neither the girl not her mother contradicted their testimony as to the defilement. Mr Kinene Addalla the Lc1 secretary for defence who intervened in t he matter testified that PW2 approached him in tears and informed him of the defilement. He arrested the culprit and took him to police. In his defence the accused told court that he had been a husband to the child\rquote s mother PW2. he suggested a love anger that could have made the woman have him arrested for defilement. \par \par From the evidence as a whole and even though there was no medical evidence, I have been able to conclude that the accused had carnal knowledge of the girl who was under age on the material time. The girls evidence and that of her mother as well as the LC defence secretary were pointing at the accused who was put at the scene of the crime. I find therefore that accused defiled Nuriat Nasuna who is a rather dull child. In law it is possibl e to convict on the un corroborated evidence of a single witness provided the trial court is satisfied
that the possibility of mistaken identify is ruled out and tested the evidence of sole identifying witness: }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Uganda Vs Musese & Anor}{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 (1982) HCB 72. It is also trite law that medical evidence and opinion are of great help. Courts may act in absence of such opinion evidence when there is other available evidence to back a conclusion. }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Ellis Vs R}{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 1965 EA. \par \par As assessors are in agreement with me I do find that the accused committed the offence of defilement as charged and I convict him accordingly. \par \par \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 \par R. O. Okumu Wengi \par }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 JUDGE \par }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 9/3/2004. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Odit: \par }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Convict is 30 years, a first offender, been on remand since 17/4/2002. Defilement is a ve ry serious offence as it involved the child of school going age. Convict took advantage of the girl. Court to protect victims in case like this. This can be done by giving a deterrent sentence. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Twijukye: \par }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Convict is a first
offender. He has children to look after though he does not live them. He has been on remand for 2 years. Lenient sentence would teach him a lesson. On other hand for purpose of time lag and resources we apply for leave to appeal this Judgment. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Court: \par }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Considering that the accused was a neighbour who was trusted by the child\rquote s mother as well as the child herself the accused\rquote s offence is not only deliberate but intended. He took advantage of a child who was not only rather dull but did so wantonly. He deserves a deterrent sentence. I take into account the fact that he has served a prison remand and I accordingly sentence him to 12 years in prison. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Sgd by:}{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 R. O. Okumu Wengi \par }\pard\plain \s4\qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel3\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f1\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10512721 JUDGE \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 9/3/2004. \par \par \par \par }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Court: \par }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Judgment and sentence read in open court in presence of accused and all the above other persons. Counsel may appeal. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 Sgd by:}{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 R. O. Okumu Wengi \par }{\b\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 JUDGE \par }{\f1\fs28\insrsid10512721 9/3/2004. \par \par \par \par }}
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.