Download

Uganda Judgment

High Court of Uganda

Uganda v Ekyorinkwasa Deus (HCT-05-CR-SC-0074 of 2003) [2003] UGHC 20 (6 November 2003)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that sexual intercourse occurred, as medical evidence did not support the complainant's testimony and there was no corroboration. However, the court was satisfied that the complainant did not consent to sexual intercourse and that the accused was properly identified at the scene by both the complainant and her companion. The accused's alibi was disproved by the prosecution's evidence. Given the lack of proof of sexual intercourse, the court convicted the accused of indecent assault under section 122(1) of the Penal Code Act, rather than rape. Regarding the theft charge, the court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole shs.59,000/= from the complainant, as the money was never recovered and there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. The accused was acquitted of theft.

Court disposition

Convicted of indecent assault; acquitted of theft.

Orders

  • The accused is convicted of indecent assault contrary to section 122(1) of the Penal Code Act.
  • The accused is acquitted of the charge of theft.

02

Material facts

Parties

Uganda

Applicant

Ekyorinkwasa Deus

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Amount Allegedly Stolen: UGX 59,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Trial / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The prosecution argued that the accused, Ekyorinkwasa Deus, snatched a handkerchief containing shs.59,000/= from the complainant and proceeded to wrestle her to the ground, where he had sexual intercourse with her without her consent. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the complainant and her companion, as well as medical evidence, to establish the elements of rape and theft. The prosecution maintained that the accused was properly identified and that his alibi was false.
Respondent
The accused denied the allegations, stating that he did not leave his home on the day in question and did not see the complainant. He raised an alibi and argued that the prosecution failed to prove that sexual intercourse occurred or that he stole any money. He contended that the evidence was insufficient and uncorroborated, and that the prosecution failed to place him at the scene beyond reasonable doubt.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Uganda Vs Kahitira [1988-1990] HCB 30

    The prosecution must prove all ingredients of the offences charged beyond reasonable doubt to secure a conviction.

  2. 02

    Chila & Another Vs R [1967] EA 722

    Courts may convict on the evidence of a complainant in sexual offences, but as a matter of practice, courts should seek corroboration before convicting on the evidence of a single witness.

  3. 03

    General criminal law principle

    Where an accused's defence is alibi, it is the duty of the prosecution to disprove the alibi by adducing evidence placing the accused at the scene of crime.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that sexual intercourse occurred, as medical evidence did not support the complainant's testimony and there was no corroboration. However, the court was satisfied that the complainant did not consent to sexual intercourse and that the accused was properly identified at the scene by both the complainant and her companion. The accused's alibi was disproved by the prosecution's evidence. Given the lack of proof of sexual intercourse, the court convicted the accused of indecent assault under section 122(1) of the Penal Code Act, rather than rape. Regarding the theft charge, the court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole shs.59,000/= from the complainant, as the money was never recovered and there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. The accused was acquitted of theft.

Obiter and limits

  • Courts must exercise caution when convicting on the uncorroborated evidence of a single witness in sexual offences.
  • The identification of the accused was reliable due to the proximity and familiarity between the parties.
  • The prosecution bears the burden to disprove an alibi and place the accused at the scene of crime.

Court disposition

Convicted of indecent assault; acquitted of theft.

  • The accused is convicted of indecent assault contrary to section 122(1) of the Penal Code Act.
  • The accused is acquitted of the charge of theft.

Source and reliance status

High Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2003] UGHC 20

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;} {\f40\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f41\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f43\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f44\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;} {\f45\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f46\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f47\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f48\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);} {\f390\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f391\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;}{\f393\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f394\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;}{\f395\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);} {\f396\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f397\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f398\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f399\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma

(Thai);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255; \red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0; \red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{ \s1\qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 1;}{\s2\ql \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1 \keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel1\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 2;}{\s3\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1 \keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f35\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 3;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph

Font;}{\* \ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1 \widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Title;}{\s16\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Body Text;}{\s17\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 footer;}{\*\cs18 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid489849818\listhybrid{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1 \levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid1680626748\'03(\'00);}{\levelnumbers\'02;}\fbias0 \fi-1080\li1080\jclisttab\tx1080\lin1080

}{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0 {\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698713\'02\'01.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li1080\jclisttab\tx1080\lin1080 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698715 \'02\'02.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li1800\jclisttab\tx1800\lin1800 }{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698703\'02\'03.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li2520 \jclisttab\tx2520\lin2520 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698713\'02\'04.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li3240\jclisttab\tx3240\lin3240 }{\listlevel \levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698715\'02\'05.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li3960\jclisttab\tx3960\lin3960 }{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0 \levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698703\'02\'06.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li4680\jclisttab\tx4680\lin4680

}{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0 \levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698713\'02\'07.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5400\jclisttab\tx5400\lin5400 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext \leveltemplateid67698715\'02\'08.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li6120\jclisttab\tx6120\lin6120 }{\listname ;}\listid1187209661}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid1187209661\listoverridecount0\ls1}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid5641001\rsid6125682} {\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author zkyarisiima}{\operator owner}{\creatim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr12\min42}{\revtim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr12\min42}{\printim\yr2006\mo5\dy4\hr14\min25}{\version3}{\edmins0} {\nofpages10}{\nofwords1052}{\nofchars6001}{\*\company Acer Customer}{\nofcharsws7039}{\vern24689}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800 \dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1\jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\rsidroot6125682 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0

\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5641001 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5641001 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5641001 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5641001 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s17\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs18\insrsid5641001 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs18\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid5641001 10}}}{\cs18\insrsid5641001 \par }\pard \s17\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid5641001 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta

.}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s15\qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\insrsid5641001 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par }\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KABALE \par }\pard\plain \s1\qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 HCT-05-CR-SC-0074 OF 2003 \par }\pard\plain \s2\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel1\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\insrsid5641001 UGANDA :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PROSECUTOR \par }\pard\plain \qc

\li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 -VERSUS- \par }\pard\plain \s2\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel1\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\insrsid5641001 EKYORINKWASA DEUS ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ACCUSED \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 \par }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 BEFORE:\tab }{\b\f35\fs28\ul\insrsid5641001 HON MR JUSTICE PAUL K. MUGAMBA}{\b\f35\fs28\insrsid5641001 \par }\pard\plain \s3\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f35\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5641001 \par }{\insrsid5641001 JUDGMENT:- \par }\pard\plain \s16\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5641001 The indictment against the accused, Ekyarinkwasa Deus, comprises two counts. The first is of rape, contrary to section 117 and 118 of the Penal Code Act. The second count is of Theft, contrary to section

245 and 252 of the Penal Code Act. Both offences are said to have been committed to the prejudice of the complainant, Kyomuhendo Patience at Kyamabare, Bubare Sub-county, Kabale District. In support of its case the prosecution called three witnesses. The complainant herself was PW1, Ky arisiima Gauda was PW2 and Dr Tumuhimbise Robert was PW3. The defence of the accused was in from of a statement on oath. Accused had no witness to call. \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 \par Briefly the prosecution case is that on 19}{\f35\fs32\super\insrsid5641001 th}{\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 November 2000 the complainant and her two companions, na mely Kyarisiima Gauda and Tukamushaba, were returning home from a mission to buy some sorghum at Kamara. They had failed to get sorghum but on the way back the complainant met one Kaguredi who promised to get her some sorghum. While the complainant disc u ssed this new development with Kaguredi her two companions moved on towards home leaving her behind. The complainant followed afterwards but before she could join her companions she met accused who snatched from her a handkerchief in which her shs.59,000 / = was tied. Accused proceeded to wrestle the complainant to the ground where he had sexual

intercourse with her without her consent. The act of sexual intercourse took place along a village path where there were no homes in the vicinity. When accused r ealized the complainant had raised an alarm, which had attracted the complainant\rquote s two companions back, he ran away. The complainant later reported the matter to the authorities who arrested accused. Accused was later charged. \par \par In his defence accused set up an alibi. He stated that on the day in issue he did not leave his home. He stated further that that day he neither went to the scene of crime nor saw the complainant who he acknowledge as a schoolmate at one time. \par \par It is the duty of the prosecution to prove all the ingredients of the offences charged beyond reasonable doubt if it is to secure a conviction for any of the offence. See }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 Uganda Vs Kahitira [1988-1990] HCB 30.}{ \f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 \par \par Where rape is the offence as in the first count, the following ingredients must be proved:- \par \par {\listtext\pard\plain\f35\fs32 \hich\af35\dbch\af0\loch\f35 (i)\tab}}\pard \qj \fi-1080\li1080\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx1080\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin1080\itap0 {\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 That there was unlawful sexual intercourse; \par {\listtext\pard\plain\f35\fs32 \hich\af35\dbch\af0\loch\f35 (ii)\tab}That the sexual

intercourse was without the consent of the complainant; \par {\listtext\pard\plain\f35\fs32 \hich\af35\dbch\af0\loch\f35 (iii)\tab}That accused participated in committing the offence. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 \par In her testimony PW1, the complainant, stated that she had sexual interco urse on the occasion alleged. No other person positively saw the complainant have sexual intercourse. Although courts may convict on the evidence of a complainant in sexual offences as a matter of practice courts will always find it safe to look for som e corroboration before convicting on the evidence of a single witness. See }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 Chila & Another Vs R [1967] EA 722, }{\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 court must warn itself and the assessors of the danger of convicting on the corroborated evidence of a single witness, but may go ahead and convi ct if it is satisfied that the witness was truthful. In the instant case PW3 examined the complainant two days after date of the alleged act of sexual intercourse. Police Form 3 which is reserved as exhibit P1 and indeed the testimony of PW3 show there is no evidence to suggest sexual intercourse happened. I hold therefore that the prosecution has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that there was sexual intercourse of that

occasion. \par \par As for consent, only the complainant could give or withhold her consent. Her testimony is that she never granted consent for sexual intercourse. I find the prosecution has proved this ingredient beyond reasonable doubt. \par Accused was known to the complainant, PW1, as well as to PW2. accused had been to the same school at Kit agyenda Primary School as PW1, a fact the accused himself acknowledges. It is still daylight at about 6.30p.m. Accused was close to PW1 when he took her handkerchief and wrestled her to the ground. They were closed to each other for about 5 minutes. I am satisfied that complainant had ample opportunity to identify the accused. According to PW2 she heard complainant cry out that she had been left alone with Deus who had \'93entered her\'94 . From a distance of 10 metres she saw the complainant lying on the gr ound and the accused, when she knew before as someone from her locality, was putting back his trouser and running away. PW2 testified that it was after 6.00p.m. but it was not dark yet. \par \par I have shown that accused\rquote s defence is of alibi. Where an accused\rquote s defence is of alibi it is not his duty to prove it. It is the duty of the prosecution to disprove the alibi by adducing evidence which places the accused squarely at the scene of crime. In the instant case I find that PW1 and PW2 properly identified th e

accused to have been at the scene. I hold therefore that the prosecution has proved the ingredients also beyond reasonable doubt. \par \par The assessors in their joint opinion find no proof of sexual intercourse. They advised me to convict of a lesser offence. I have related to the same finding in the course of this judgment. Given the evidence of PW1 and PW2 showing the accused threw the complainant on the ground and lay on her on a footpath. I find the accused guilty of the indecent assault, contrary to sec tion 122 (1) of the Penal Code Act and convict him accordingly. \par Concerning the second count of Theft prosecution must prove that something of value capable of being stolen was taken and that it was stolen by the accused to permanently deprive the owner of t he same. Here again the prosecution has the onus to prove the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Both PW1 and PW2 testified that PW1 had been in possession of shs.59,000/=. According to PW1 the accused grabbed her handkerchief containing

the shs.59,000/= from her. At that time she was above with the accused. Later when PW2 came to the scene she saw the complainant searching around the scene for her money. According to PW2 the complainant told her, her money had gone missing at the scen e . That money was never recovered anywhere, let alone on the accused. Had the accused been seen to take the money as alleged by PW1, the natural thing would have been for PW1 to tell PW2 that had been the case. In the event PW1 merely searched around th e scene. Consequently I find the prosecution has not proved beyond reasonable doubt the charge of theft against the accused. \par \par In the joint opinion the assessors advised me to acquit the accused of the second count. Fro the reasons I have given in the course of judgment I agree with that opinion. I find accused not guilty of theft and acquit him. \par \par }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 \par \par P. K. MUGAMBA \par }\pard\plain \s3\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f35\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5641001 JUDGE \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 6}{\b\f35\fs32\super\insrsid5641001 th}{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 November 2003. \par }{\f35\fs32\insrsid5641001 \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid5641001 \par \par }}

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Uganda Vs Kahitira [1988-1990] HCB 30

Case cited

Chila & Another Vs R [1967] EA 722

Case cited

Penal Code Act, sections 117, 118, 122(1), 245, 252

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.