Share
Kateyo v Makerere University (Labour Dispute Reference No. 187 of 2019) [2021] UGIC 35 (17 September 2021)
- Citation
- [2021] UGIC 35
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- Industrial Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Katende, Panel Member, Ruhinda-Ntengye, J, Bwire, Panel Member, Nyacho, Panel Member
- Case number
- Labour Dispute Reference No. 187 of 2019
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Industrial Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Katende, Panel Member, Ruhinda-Ntengye, J, Bwire, Panel Member, Nyacho, Panel Member
- Case number
- Labour Dispute Reference No. 187 of 2019
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that the award of interest is discretionary and must be justified by the claimant. The claimant failed to adhere to the agreed timelines for filing submissions, and the respondent did not file any submissions. The absence of both parties' submissions at the time of the court's discussion, coupled with the claimant's unexplained delay, led the court to conclude that interest was not warranted. The monetary award had already been paid into the claimant's account, and the court was not persuaded that interest was necessary. Therefore, no interest accrues on the settled amount.
Court disposition
interest denied; no order as to costs
Orders
- No interest accrues on the settled amount already paid into the claimant's account.
- No order as to costs is made.
02
Material facts
Parties
Kateyo Eliezer Mujugwa
Claimant Counsel: Nankya SumayaMakerere University
Respondent Counsel: Natukunda PhionaAmounts and remedies
- Settled Retirement Benefits Amount: UGX 35,096,621
03
Procedural history
Posture
Labour Dispute Reference / Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether interest is payable on the settled retirement benefits amount.
- 02
If interest is payable, at what rate and from which date should it accrue.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The claimant argued for the award of interest on the settled sum of 35,096,621/=, asserting entitlement due to delayed payment and referencing the timelines agreed for submissions. The claimant submitted late, on 08/09/2021, and maintained that interest should be granted as part of the retirement benefits.
- Respondent
- The respondent did not file submissions by the agreed timeline of 20/08/2021. No argument from the respondent was on record at the time of the court's decision.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 20 of the Civil Procedure Act
The award of interest by the court is discretionary and depends on whether the successful party deserves it.
- 02
Uganda Revenue Authority Vs Stephen Mabosi SCCA 1/1996
The burden is on the claimant to establish entitlement to interest.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that the award of interest is discretionary and must be justified by the claimant. The claimant failed to adhere to the agreed timelines for filing submissions, and the respondent did not file any submissions. The absence of both parties' submissions at the time of the court's discussion, coupled with the claimant's unexplained delay, led the court to conclude that interest was not warranted. The monetary award had already been paid into the claimant's account, and the court was not persuaded that interest was necessary. Therefore, no interest accrues on the settled amount.
Obiter and limits
- Allowing discussions outside the timetables would have meant postponing judgement not at the instance of the court but at the instance of the unexplained delay of the claimant to file submissions.
- The court felt uncomfortable discussing the claimant's submissions in the absence of the respondent's submissions.
Court disposition
interest denied; no order as to costs
- No interest accrues on the settled amount already paid into the claimant's account.
- No order as to costs is made.
Source and reliance status
Industrial Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Industrial Court of Uganda
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA
LABOUR DISPUTE REFERENCE NO. 187 OF 2019
[ARISING FROM KCCA/LC/047/2019]
BETWEEN
KATEYO ELIEZER MUJUGWA….………………………………………….……...………..….. CLAIMANT
VERSUS
MAKERERE UNIVERSITY ……...………………………………………………….……….. RESPONDENT
BEFORE
1. Hon. Head Judge Ruhinda Asaph Ntengye
PANELISTS
- 1. Mr. Bwire John Abraham - 2. Ms. Julian Nyachwo - 3. Mr. Patrick Katende
RULING
Background
The claimant filed a memorandum of claim in this court on 12/7/2019 claiming 226,884,010/= as retirement benefits. Subsequently, on 17/02/2020 the parties settled out of Court in the sum of 35,096,621/= although they disagreed on whether or not interest should be paid.
This ruling is therefore to decide whether or not interest is payable and if so at what rate and from which date?
Decision
On 11/05/2021 M/s. Nankya Sumaya appeared for the claimant while M/s. Natukunda Phiona appeared for the respondent.
Both counsel agreed on time lines to file submissions date and the timelines were as follows:
The claimant was to have filed by 16/08/2021 while the respondent was to have filed by 20/08/2021 a rejoinder by the claimant was to have been filed by 08/09/2021.
The quorum of the court was to sit on 10/9/2021 to discuss the submissions and reach a decision. The ruling was to be delivered on 17/09/2021.
Despite the above timelines proposed and agreed to by both counsel, nothing was on the record by 16/08/2021.
By 10th September in the morning hours when this court sat to discuss the submissions only claimant's submissions were on file having been filed on 08/09/2021 3 weeks late. Understandably the respondent's submissions were not on file. We did not take interest in looking at the claimant's submissions because of the dilatory delay to file the same and subsequent absence of the respondent's submissions on file.
The award of interest by the court is a discretionary matter. Interest can only be awarded if in the discretion of the court the successful party deserves it. This is the essence of Section 20 of the Civil Procedure Act. It is also the ruling of the court in Uganda Revenue Authority Vs Stephen Mabosi SCCA 1/1996.
It was upon the claimant to establish the need of this court to grant him interest.
The fact that he ignored the timelines agreed in court, in our view indicated that the award of interest was not as necessary as the monetary award already paid into his account. We felt uncomfortable discussing the claimant's submissions in the absence of the respondent's submissions having realized that the claimant filed on 8/09/2021 instead of 16/08/2021 and the discussion having taken place as per schedule on 10/9/2021.
Allowing discussions outside the timetables would have meant postponing judgement not at the instance of the court but at the instance of the unexplained delay of the claimant to file submissions. In our view this was not acceptable. Accordingly in the discretion of this court, we hold that in the absence of both submissions on the file as we discussed the matter, and given that the claimant had a burden to prove his entitlement to interest, No interest accrues at all on the settled amount and already paid into the claimant's accounts.
No order as to costs is made.
Delivered & signed by:
1. Hon. Head Judge Ruhinda Asaph Ntengye …………….
PANELISTS
- 1. Mr. Bwire John Abraham ……………………. - 2. Ms. Julian Nyachwo …………………….
3. Mr. Patrick Katende …………………….
Dated: 17/09/2021
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.