Share
Kalilou and Another v Côte d'Ivoire (Application No. 036/2019; Application No. 037/2019) [2019] AfCHPR 33 (13 September 2019)
- Citation
- [2019] AfCHPR 33
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Aboud J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Eno R, Kioko VP, Matusse J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Tchikaya J
- Case number
- Application No. 036/2019 ; Application No. 037/2019
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Aboud J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Eno R, Kioko VP, Matusse J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Tchikaya J
- Case number
- Application No. 036/2019 ; Application No. 037/2019
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court determined that the applications by Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim are based on substantially similar facts, legal issues, and reliefs sought, all directed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. Both applicants were tried and sentenced for the same offence, allege violations of comparable rights, and are represented by the same lawyer. The consolidation of cases is appropriate for judicial economy and the good administration of justice, as permitted by Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure. The joinder will facilitate efficient handling of the proceedings and ensure consistency in the adjudication of the alleged violations.
Court disposition
order_for_joinder_granted
Orders
- The cases and proceedings in the applications filed by Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire are joined.
- The applications shall henceforth be referred to as 'Consolidated Applications 036/2019 and 037/2019 - Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim v. Côte d'Ivoire'.
- This order and the pleadings relating to these matters shall be served on all parties.
02
Material facts
Parties
Konate Kalilou
Applicant Counsel: Same lawyer as Doumbia IbrahimDoumbia Ibrahim
Applicant Counsel: Same lawyer as Konate KalilouRepublic of Côte d'Ivoire
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Order for Joinder
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the facts and legal issues in both applications justify a joinder of cases and proceedings.
- 02
Whether the alleged violations of rights and reliefs sought are sufficiently similar to warrant consolidation.
- 03
Whether joinder is appropriate for the good administration of justice under Rule 54 of the Rules of Court.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Both applicants, represented by the same lawyer, allege violations of their rights to a fair trial, equality, dignity, access to justice, and effective remedy under the African Charter, ICCPR, and UDHR. They were tried and sentenced without representation by counsel, and seek similar reliefs against the same respondent state.
- Respondent
- The respondent state did not object to the joinder and is the common party in both applications. No distinct argument against consolidation was presented.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
The Court may, at any stage of the pleadings, order the joinder of cases where it deems it appropriate in fact and in law.
- 02
Practice under Rule 54 and general principles of civil procedure
Joinder is justified where applications arise from similar facts, allege similar violations, and seek similar measures against the same respondent.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court determined that the applications by Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim are based on substantially similar facts, legal issues, and reliefs sought, all directed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. Both applicants were tried and sentenced for the same offence, allege violations of comparable rights, and are represented by the same lawyer. The consolidation of cases is appropriate for judicial economy and the good administration of justice, as permitted by Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure. The joinder will facilitate efficient handling of the proceedings and ensure consistency in the adjudication of the alleged violations.
Obiter and limits
- The consolidation does not prejudice the individual claims of the applicants.
- The French text of the order is authoritative.
Court disposition
order_for_joinder_granted
- The cases and proceedings in the applications filed by Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire are joined.
- The applications shall henceforth be referred to as 'Consolidated Applications 036/2019 and 037/2019 - Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim v. Côte d'Ivoire'.
- This order and the pleadings relating to these matters shall be served on all parties.
Source and reliance status
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Judgment
| | | | | --- | --- | --- | | AFRICAN UNION |  | UNION AFRICAINE | |  | UNIÃO AFRICANA | | AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DES PEUPLES | | |
THE MATTER OF
KONATE KALILOU
V.
REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE
APPLICATION NO. 036/2019
AND
DOUMBIA IBRAHIM
V.
REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE
APPLICATION NO. 037/2019
ORDER FOR JOINDER OF CASES
13 SEPTEMBER 2019
The Court composed of: Ben KIOKO, Vice-President, Rafaa BEN ACHOUR, Angelo V. MATUSSE, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Thérèse MUKAMULISA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Blaise TCHIKAYA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Imani D. ABOUD Judges and Robert ENO, Registrar.
Pursuant to Article 22 of the Protocol relating to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights establishing an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Protocol") and Article 8(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"), Judge Sylvain ORE of Ivorian nationality, recused himself.
In the Matters of
KONATE KALILOU
*V.*
REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE
APPLICATION No. 036/2019
AND
DOUMBIA IBRAHIM
*V.*
REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE
APPLICATION No. 037/2019
After deliberations,
1. Considering the application dated 10 June 2019, received at the Registry of the Court on 22 July 2019, from Mr Konate Kalilou (hereinafter referred to as "the Applicant") filed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State"); 2. Considering the application dated 10 June 2019, received at the Registry of the Court on 22 July 2019, from Mr Doumbia Ibrahim filed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State "); 3. Considering that Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, provides:"The Court may, at any stage of the pleadings, of its own volition or in response to an application of one of the parties, order the joinder where it deems it appropriate in fact and in law"; 4. Considering that, while the Applicants are different as above stated, they are represented by the same lawyer, and the Applications are filed against the same Respondent State, which is the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire 5. Considering that the facts supporting the applications are similar, since they originate from the trial of Applicants and their sentences, without representation by counsel, to twenty (20) years imprisonment by the Divo Court of First Instance for ganging up to commit armed robbery with violence; this 20-year sentence was reduced after appeal to a fixed term of imprisonment of 15 years by judgment No. 141
of 21march2013 of the Second Criminal Chamber of the Daloa Court of Appeal, the judge of the second instance confirmed judgment No. 342 of 14 June 2012; 6. Considering that in both proceedings, the Applicants allege that the Respondent State has violated their rights to a fair trial, equality and dignity, the right of access to justice and the right to an effective remedy as set out in the African Charter, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and that the reliefs sought are similar in nature; 7. Considering therefore that the facts in support of the applications, the alleged violations and the measures requested are similar and taking into account the identity of the Respondent State; 8. Mindful of all of the above, a joinder of cases and pleadings in relation to these Applications is appropriate in fact and in law, and for the good administration of justice pursuant to Rule 54 of the Rules of the Court.
OPERATIVE PART
For these reasons,
The Court
Unanimously
Orders:
1. The joinder of cases and proceedings in the Application filed by the Applicants against the Respondent State; 2. That henceforth the Applications be referred to as “Consolidated Applications 036/2019 and 037/2019 - Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim v. Côte d'Ivoire.
3. That consequent upon the joinder, this Order and the pleadings relating to the above referred Matters shall be served on all the Parties.
In accordance with Article 28(7) of the Protocol and Rule 60(5) of the Rules, the separate opinion of Judge Chafika BENSAOULA is attached to this order.
Done in Arusha, this thirteenth day of the month of September 2019 in English and French, the French text being authoritative
Signed:
Ben KIOKO, Vice-President;
and Robert ENO, Registrar.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.