Download

Uganda Judgment

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Kalilou and Another v Côte d'Ivoire (Application No. 036/2019; Application No. 037/2019) [2019] AfCHPR 33 (13 September 2019)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court determined that the applications by Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim are based on substantially similar facts, legal issues, and reliefs sought, all directed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. Both applicants were tried and sentenced for the same offence, allege violations of comparable rights, and are represented by the same lawyer. The consolidation of cases is appropriate for judicial economy and the good administration of justice, as permitted by Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure. The joinder will facilitate efficient handling of the proceedings and ensure consistency in the adjudication of the alleged violations.

Court disposition

order_for_joinder_granted

Orders

  • The cases and proceedings in the applications filed by Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire are joined.
  • The applications shall henceforth be referred to as 'Consolidated Applications 036/2019 and 037/2019 - Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim v. Côte d'Ivoire'.
  • This order and the pleadings relating to these matters shall be served on all parties.

02

Material facts

Parties

Konate Kalilou

Applicant Counsel: Same lawyer as Doumbia Ibrahim

Doumbia Ibrahim

Applicant Counsel: Same lawyer as Konate Kalilou

Republic of Côte d'Ivoire

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Order for Joinder

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Both applicants, represented by the same lawyer, allege violations of their rights to a fair trial, equality, dignity, access to justice, and effective remedy under the African Charter, ICCPR, and UDHR. They were tried and sentenced without representation by counsel, and seek similar reliefs against the same respondent state.
Respondent
The respondent state did not object to the joinder and is the common party in both applications. No distinct argument against consolidation was presented.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights

    The Court may, at any stage of the pleadings, order the joinder of cases where it deems it appropriate in fact and in law.

  2. 02

    Practice under Rule 54 and general principles of civil procedure

    Joinder is justified where applications arise from similar facts, allege similar violations, and seek similar measures against the same respondent.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court determined that the applications by Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim are based on substantially similar facts, legal issues, and reliefs sought, all directed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. Both applicants were tried and sentenced for the same offence, allege violations of comparable rights, and are represented by the same lawyer. The consolidation of cases is appropriate for judicial economy and the good administration of justice, as permitted by Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure. The joinder will facilitate efficient handling of the proceedings and ensure consistency in the adjudication of the alleged violations.

Obiter and limits

  • The consolidation does not prejudice the individual claims of the applicants.
  • The French text of the order is authoritative.

Court disposition

order_for_joinder_granted

  • The cases and proceedings in the applications filed by Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire are joined.
  • The applications shall henceforth be referred to as 'Consolidated Applications 036/2019 and 037/2019 - Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim v. Côte d'Ivoire'.
  • This order and the pleadings relating to these matters shall be served on all parties.

Source and reliance status

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Judgment

[2019] AfCHPR 33

| | | | | --- | --- | --- | | AFRICAN UNION | ![Description: Description: Description: Description: AU Court logo](data:image/jpeg;base64...) | UNION AFRICAINE | | ![](data:image/png;base64...) | UNIÃO AFRICANA | | AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DES PEUPLES | | |

THE MATTER OF

KONATE KALILOU

V.

REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE

APPLICATION NO. 036/2019

AND

DOUMBIA IBRAHIM

V.

REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE

APPLICATION NO. 037/2019

ORDER FOR JOINDER OF CASES

13 SEPTEMBER 2019

The Court composed of: Ben KIOKO, Vice-President, Rafaa BEN ACHOUR, Angelo V. MATUSSE, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Thérèse MUKAMULISA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Blaise TCHIKAYA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Imani D. ABOUD Judges and Robert ENO, Registrar.

Pursuant to Article 22 of the Protocol relating to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights establishing an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Protocol") and Article 8(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"), Judge Sylvain ORE of Ivorian nationality, recused himself.

In the Matters of

KONATE KALILOU

*V.*

REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE

APPLICATION No. 036/2019

AND

DOUMBIA IBRAHIM

*V.*

REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE

APPLICATION No. 037/2019

After deliberations,

1. Considering the application dated 10 June 2019, received at the Registry of the Court on 22 July 2019, from Mr Konate Kalilou (hereinafter referred to as "the Applicant") filed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State"); 2. Considering the application dated 10 June 2019, received at the Registry of the Court on 22 July 2019, from Mr Doumbia Ibrahim filed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State "); 3. Considering that Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, provides:"The Court may, at any stage of the pleadings, of its own volition or in response to an application of one of the parties, order the joinder where it deems it appropriate in fact and in law"; 4. Considering that, while the Applicants are different as above stated, they are represented by the same lawyer, and the Applications are filed against the same Respondent State, which is the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire 5. Considering that the facts supporting the applications are similar, since they originate from the trial of Applicants and their sentences, without representation by counsel, to twenty (20) years imprisonment by the Divo Court of First Instance for ganging up to commit armed robbery with violence; this 20-year sentence was reduced after appeal to a fixed term of imprisonment of 15 years by judgment No. 141

of 21march2013 of the Second Criminal Chamber of the Daloa Court of Appeal, the judge of the second instance confirmed judgment No. 342 of 14 June 2012; 6. Considering that in both proceedings, the Applicants allege that the Respondent State has violated their rights to a fair trial, equality and dignity, the right of access to justice and the right to an effective remedy as set out in the African Charter, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and that the reliefs sought are similar in nature; 7. Considering therefore that the facts in support of the applications, the alleged violations and the measures requested are similar and taking into account the identity of the Respondent State; 8. Mindful of all of the above, a joinder of cases and pleadings in relation to these Applications is appropriate in fact and in law, and for the good administration of justice pursuant to Rule 54 of the Rules of the Court.

OPERATIVE PART

For these reasons,

The Court

Unanimously

Orders:

1. The joinder of cases and proceedings in the Application filed by the Applicants against the Respondent State; 2. That henceforth the Applications be referred to as “Consolidated Applications 036/2019 and 037/2019 - Konate Kalilou and Doumbia Ibrahim v. Côte d'Ivoire.

3. That consequent upon the joinder, this Order and the pleadings relating to the above referred Matters shall be served on all the Parties.

In accordance with Article 28(7) of the Protocol and Rule 60(5) of the Rules, the separate opinion of Judge Chafika BENSAOULA is attached to this order.

Done in Arusha, this thirteenth day of the month of September 2019 in English and French, the French text being authoritative

Signed:

Ben KIOKO, Vice-President;

and Robert ENO, Registrar.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights establishing an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Rules of Procedure of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.