Section Special provisions on enforcement of patent rights Section For the purposes of subsection (9) , the courts may refuse to grant provisional or definitive injunctions, without prejudice to the payment of damages, where— The court may order the infringer to pay damages relating to acts of infringement of patent rights practised— Any identical product when produced without the consent of the patent owner shall, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be deemed to have been obtained by the patented process in the following circumstances— Subject to sections 37 , 58 , 59 , and 67 , the performance of any act referred to in section 37(2) in Uganda by a person other than the owner of the patent and without the agreement of the owner shall constitute an infringement of the patent. On the request of the owner of the patent , or of an exclusive licensee , or of a compulsory licensee , or of a non-exclusive licensee if he or she has requested the owner to institute court proceedings for a specific relief and the owner has refused or failed to do so within ninety days, the court may grant an injunction to prevent infringement or an imminent infringement and, where the infringer acted knowingly or with reasonable grounds to know, the court may award damages and grant any other remedy provided for in this Act. The remedies provided to owners of patents in Uganda shall also be available, where appropriate, to the owners of foreign patents that have been the subject of a compulsory licence for the purposes of supplying the market in Uganda of pharmaceutical products, under the scheme established by the decision of the World Trade Organisation General Council of August 30, 2003, in order to prevent or remedy the unauthorised importation as well as the re-exportation or deviation of the products in question. Where a foreign patent referred to in subsection (3) resulted from applications that were filed in the country where the compulsory licence was granted after the coming into force of this Act or that were entitled to claim priority in Uganda on that same date, only those applications that are filed in Uganda in accordance with section 27 shall benefit from the remedies provided for in this section as well as in the general law on enforcement. The customs authorities shall have the authority to take border measures for the purposes of this section. Where the customs authorities take action under subsection (5) , they shall notify the rights owner of the suspension of release and the rights owner shall have ten days to provide adequate evidence that the retained products prima facie correspond to the claims of the patent in question. Without prejudice to subsection (3) , the same border measures that are available for the suspension by the customs authorities of the release into free circulation of counterfeit trademark and pirated copyright goods shall also apply to prevent the unauthorised importation or re-exportation of the products that have actually been imported into the territory of Uganda under the scheme referred to in subsection (3) . This section shall not apply to re-exportation of pharmaceutical products to other members of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA). Provisional measures aimed at preserving relevant evidence shall also be available before the granting of the pending patent application , where the court deems necessary. The applicant shall initiate proceedings in court within twenty working days or thirty-one calendar days, whichever is the longer, from the publication of the grant of the pending registration. after the expiration of four years from the date of filing of the patent application or three years from the date of the grant of the patent , the plaintiff or a person with authorisation of the plaintiff is not, or has not taken serious preparations for, or has no serious intention to start, commercially exploiting the invention in a manner that meets the demands of the market as to quantity, or at any time if the invention is exploited in a manner that does not meet the demands of the market as to quality; the injunction causes serious harm to the public interest; the patented products or the products manufactured by a patented process are sold by the plaintiff or by a third party with the plaintiff’s consent at prices that are deemed excessive taking into account the average purchasing power of consumers and the specific nature of the needs the products aim at meeting, and there is no competing product on the market; the plaintiff has engaged in inequitable conduct contrary to section 18(2) ; the patent was obtained in contravention of section 20(6) and (7) . At any time after ensuring compliance with section 20(6) and (7) of this Act, the patent holder may initiate proceedings on grounds of infringement under this, section. A remedy shall not be available to the patent holder in respect of any acts done by third parties before the patent holder has ensured compliance with section 20(6) and (7) . Where the act of infringement is practised by the Government or for the purposes of serving the Government the court shall not issue an injunction other than for obtaining evidence in control of the infringer, if necessary, without prejudice to the accounting of damages. The rights accruing from patents for pharmaceutical processes shall not be enforceable until 1 st January, 2016, or such other period as may be granted to Uganda or Least Developed Countries by the council responsible for administering the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property under the World Trade Organisation if alternative processes for making pharmaceutical products that are not subject to exclusive rights are not available and those patents, if enforced, indirectly give rise to market exclusivity of the pharmaceutical products in question. after the date on which the patent application was opened for public inspection in accordance with section 28 ; or after the date on which the patent applicant gave notice to the alleged infringer of the contents of the application ; or after the date on which the alleged infringer acquired knowledge of the contents of the application by any means. The request for the court to order the payment of damages under subsection (2) may be filed only after the title of industrial property right in question is granted. Subsection (17) shall apply to those applications to which section 7(3)(f) refers only after 1st January, 2016 or such other period as may be granted to Uganda or Least Developed Countries by the council responsible for administering the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property under the World Trade Organisation. For the purposes of civil proceedings in respect of the infringement of rights of the patent owner, if the subject matter of a patent is a process for obtaining a product, the court may order the defendant to prove that the process used to obtain an identical product is different from the patented process. if the product obtained by the patented process is new; or if there is a substantial likelihood that the identical product was made by the process and the owner of the patent has been unable through reasonable efforts to determine the process actually used. In the adduction of proof to the contrary, the legitimate interests of defendants in protecting their manufacturing and business secrets shall be taken into account by the court , which, among other measures, shall not facilitate those secrets to the plaintiff.