Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] UGCA 40

Biryomumisho v Uganda

Biryomumisho v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 406 of 2019) [2025] UGCA 40 (13 February 2025)

The Court of Appeal struck out four general grounds as non-compliant, upheld the murder conviction, but reduced the sentence after crediting full remand time and age as mitigation.

  • Murder
  • Sentencing Guidelines
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Remand Credit
  • Youthful Offender
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2022] UGCA 14

Ntambi v Uganda

Ntambi v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2011) [2022] UGCA 14 (10 February 2022)

The Court of Appeal reduced a murder sentence from life imprisonment to 30 years, finding the trial court failed to consider the appellant’s youthful age as a mitigating factor.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Aggravating Factors
  • Murder
  • Remand Period
  • Youthful Offender
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] UGCA 352

Kalenzi Vs Uganda

Kalenzi Vs Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 282 of 2011) [2019] UGCA 352 (30 September 2019)

The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge, while considering the appellant's age, wrongly treated it as an aggravating factor rather than a mitigating one. The court emphasized that youth, remorse, and the potential for reform should weigh in favor of a more lenient sentence. The appellate court also considered the need for consistency with sentences imposed in similar cases, referencing Abelle Asuman v Uganda, where 18 years was upheld as appropriate. The court concluded that the 23-year sentence was manifestly excessive in the circumstances, especially given the appellant's age, first…

  • Aggravated Robbery
  • Sentencing Guidelines
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Remand Period
  • Youthful Offender
  • Sentencing Discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] UGCA 201

Tayebwa & Anor Vs Uganda

Tayebwa & Anor Vs Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 519 of 2014) [2019] UGCA 201 (2 July 2019)

The Court of Appeal reduced murder sentences after finding the trial court failed to consider remand time, youth, and the second appellant’s first-offender status.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Remand Period Deduction
  • First Offender
  • Youthful Offender
  • Murder
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1934] EACA 2

Rex v Liduma and Another (Cr. Conf. Case No. 861/1934.)

Rex v Liduma and Another (Cr. Conf. Case No. 861/1934.) [1934] EACA 2 (1 January 1934)

The court reduced a burglary sentence from five to three years after finding the magistrate’s “confirmed criminal” label was unsupported by the record.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Burglary
  • Sentence Reduction
  • Habitual Offender
  • Youthful Offender
  • Sentencing-principles
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.