Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Land And Property [2025] UGHC 135

Kasukali v Kiiza (HCT-01-CV-CS-LD 37 of 2019)

Kasukali v Kiiza (HCT-01-CV-CS-LD 37 of 2019) [2025] UGHC 135 (28 February 2025)

The High Court dismissed a land claim over a plot in Kyenjojo, finding the plaintiff failed to prove ownership and that the judicial sale and eviction were unlawful.

  • Trespass To Land
  • Judicial Sale
  • Wrongful Eviction
  • Ownership Dispute
  • Execution Of Decree
  • Land-dispute
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2025] UGCA 19

Attorney General & Another v Byaruhanga & 2499 Others (Consolidated Appeals No. 246 & 375 of 2021)

Attorney General & Another v Byaruhanga & 2499 Others (Consolidated Appeals No. 246 & 375 of 2021) [2025] UGCA 19 (16 January 2025)

The Court of Appeal found that the respondents were not encroachers but had been lawfully allocated the suit land by presidential directive and had acquired title by adverse possession after 19 years of unchallenged occupation. The appellants failed to rebut the respondents' evidence or provide contrary documentation. The technical assessment and valuation report by PW4, though not prepared by a registered valuation surveyor, was admissible as expert evidence due to his specialized knowledge and experience as District Agricultural Officer. The respondents' claim for special damages was suffic…

  • Wrongful Eviction
  • Adverse Possession
  • Compensation For Land
  • Damages Assessment
  • Expert Evidence
  • Limitation Of Actions
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2018] UGHCCD 54

Komakech & 7 Ors Vs Ayaa & Anor

Komakech & 7 Ors Vs Ayaa & Anor (CIVIL APPEAL No. 0028 OF 2016) [2018] UGHCCD 54 (11 October 2018)

The High Court found that the 5th and 6th appellants were the lawful owners of the premises and that an oral tenancy agreement existed with the respondents, who defaulted on rent for over twenty-one months. The court held that, under the Rent Restriction Act, tenants holding over after expiry of a tenancy are statutory tenants and cannot be evicted except by court order. The appellants' self-help eviction was therefore unlawful. However, the respondents failed to strictly prove special damages for loss of property, as there was no evidence directly attributing the loss to the appellants or es…

  • Tenancy Disputes
  • Wrongful Eviction
  • Arrears Of Rent
  • Damages Assessment
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Counterclaim Procedure
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.