Andrew Kananura v Sheila Taratibu (Divorce Cause 62 of 2024) [2025] UGHCFD 53 (27 June 2025)
Court
HC: Family Division (Uganda)
Case number
Divorce Cause 62 of 2024
Judge
Keitirima, J
The court determined that the paramount consideration in custody matters is the welfare and best interests of the children, as mandated by the Children Act and constitutional provisions. Both parents have equal rights and responsibilities, and there was insufficient evidence to establish that the petitioner posed a risk of harm or abuse to the children. The evidence showed that both parents have historically provided for the children and that animosity between them should not preclude joint parenting. Sole custody is reserved for exceptional cases involving proven abuse, which was not establi…
Kakama v Asiimwe (Civil Appeal 7 of 2021) [2025] UGHCFD 2 (31 January 2025)
Court
HC: Family Division (Uganda)
Case number
Civil Appeal 7 of 2021
Judge
Nagawa, J
High Court family appeal on custody, maintenance and costs. The court replaced sole custody with joint custody, revised maintenance, and set aside costs.
The Court of Appeal found that the High Court's judgment and orders were unsustainable due to insufficient evidence regarding the identification and distribution of matrimonial property, the basis for the maintenance order, and the restriction of visitation rights. The appellate court held that while consent judgments are generally not appealable, the record showed that only some issues were resolved by consent, with others adjudicated by the trial court and thus appealable. The High Court was justified in entertaining the appeal on those issues. However, the evidence before the High Court wa…
Muhangi v Karungi (Matrimonial Cause 22 of 2022) [2023] UGHCFD 92 (29 May 2023)
Court
HC: Family Division (Uganda)
Case number
Matrimonial Cause 22 of 2022
Judge
Katunguka Kitariisibwa, J
The High Court granted the mother physical custody of the child, joint legal custody to both parents, visitation for the father, and monthly maintenance orders.
Ahmed v Mohamed (Cause No. 9 of 1951) [1952] EACA 318 (1 January 1952)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Cause No. 9 of 1951
Judge
Connell J
Custody dispute under Mohammedan law: the court held that the child’s intelligent preference and welfare favored the father’s custody, with maternal visitation preserved.