Rex v Nono (Cr. App. No. 95/1936)
Rex v Nono (Cr. App. No. 95/1936) [1936] EACA 138 (1 January 1936)
The court held that a repatriation order under the Vagrancy Ordinance required a charge and finding of vagrancy, and that a formal judgment had to be recorded.
- Vagrancy Offences
- Procedural Irregularities
- Conviction Requirements
- Vagrancy-offences
- Criminal-procedure
- Conviction-requirements