Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [1946] EACA 62

Rex v Kachilichili

Rex v Kachilichili (Criminal Appeal No. 157 of 1946) [1946] EACA 62 (1 January 1946)

The court held that suspicion alone does not shift the burden to an accused in an unlawful possession of stock case; the prosecution must first show circumstances reasonably suggesting theft.

  • Unlawful Possession Of Stock
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Proclaimed District Offences
  • Unlawful-possession-of-stock
  • Burden-of-proof
  • Proclaimed-district-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1945] EACA 45

Rex v Oyoo

Rex v Oyoo (Criminal Appeal No. 147 Of 1945) [1945] EACA 45 (1 January 1945)

The East African Court of Appeal upheld a conviction for unlawful possession of stock, held the magistrate could call a rebuttal witness, and varied sentence.

  • Unlawful Possession Of Stock
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Stock Theft
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Unlawful-possession-of-stock
  • Burden-of-proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1938] EACA 157

Rex v Kurgat (Confirmation Case No. 910 of 1939)

Rex v Kurgat (Confirmation Case No. 910 of 1939) [1938] EACA 157 (1 January 1938)

The court upheld a conviction for unlawful possession of stock, ruling that a confession made under arrest was inadmissible except for the part that led to discovery of the cattle.

  • Admissibility Of Confessions
  • Evidence Discovered By Confession
  • Unlawful Possession Of Stock
  • Admissibility-of-confessions
  • Section-27-evidence
  • Criminal-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1938] EACA 193

Rex v Onyancha (Cr. Conf. Case No. 834/1937)

Rex v Onyancha (Cr. Conf. Case No. 834/1937) [1938] EACA 193 (1 January 1938)

The East African Court of Appeal held that section 10 of the Stock and Produce Theft (Levy of Fines) Ordinance, 1933 creates a distinct offence, not merely a burden-shifting rule.

  • Stock Theft
  • Unlawful Possession Of Stock
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Statutory Offences
  • Stock-theft
  • Unlawful-possession-of-stock
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.