Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tort Law [2024] UGHC 925

No. 46516 PC Ababa v Attorney General

No. 46516 PC Ababa v Attorney General (Civil Suit 10 of 2016) [2024] UGHC 925 (20 September 2024)

The plaintiff was unlawfully re-arrested and detained by police officers, agents of the defendant, for a period of 27 days following his release on bail, without any reasonable grounds or being produced before court. This detention exceeded the statutory 48-hour limit and violated the plaintiff's constitutional right to liberty. The defendant failed to justify the re-arrest and detention, and is vicariously liable for the unlawful acts of its agents. The plaintiff's claims of torture were not substantiated by credible evidence and were rejected. The plaintiff is entitled to general damages fo…

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • False Imprisonment
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Damages
  • Interest Award
Read case analysis
Tort Law [2023] UGHCCD 346

Mukesh Shukla v Attorney General

Mukesh Shukla v Attorney General [2023] UGHCCD 346 (13 November 2023)

The court found that the Plaintiff's arrest was lawful, as it was based on a complaint, sanctioned by the DPP, and executed within statutory requirements. Regarding malicious prosecution, the court held that although criminal proceedings were instituted and terminated in the Plaintiff's favor, there was reasonable and probable cause for prosecution due to the business dispute and allegations made by the complainant. The Plaintiff failed to prove malice or lack of reasonable cause on the part of the Defendant. The withdrawal of charges was conditional, aimed at facilitating settlement of civil…

  • Malicious Prosecution
  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Damages
  • Government Liability
Read case analysis
Tort Law [2023] UGHCCD 376

Berwanaho Charles v Attorney General

Berwanaho Charles v Attorney General (Civil Suit 391 of 2018) [2023] UGHCCD 376 (10 November 2023)

The Plaintiff was unlawfully arrested and detained by agents of the Defendant without reasonable suspicion and in a place not authorized by law, violating his constitutional rights. The Defendant failed to adduce evidence justifying the arrest or detention. The Plaintiff was subjected to battery and torture, as evidenced by unchallenged testimony and corroborated medical evidence. The Defendant is vicariously liable for the actions of its agents, who acted within the scope of their employment. The Plaintiff proved entitlement to special damages for medical expenses, transport, special diet, a…

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Illegal Detention
  • Battery
  • Torture
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Damages Assessment
Read case analysis
Tort Law [2023] UGHC 515

Ochola James v Owor Michael and Others

Ochola James v Owor Michael and Others (Civil Appeal No 016 of 2023) [2023] UGHC 515 (8 April 2023)

The High Court found that the trial Magistrate properly evaluated the evidence and correctly concluded that the Plaintiff failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the Defendants assaulted him or caused his unlawful arrest and detention. The Plaintiff's witnesses gave contradictory accounts regarding the circumstances of the alleged assault, particularly about identification at night and the sequence of events. The Defendants raised the defense of alibi, and the Plaintiff did not sufficiently place them at the scene. Regarding the arrest, the Court held that the Defendants' act o…

  • Assault
  • Unlawful Arrest
  • False Imprisonment
  • Burden Of Proof
Read case analysis
Tort Law [2023] UGHCCD 371

Ntwatwa Jackson v Attorney General & 3 Others

Ntwatwa Jackson v Attorney General & 3 Others (Civil Suit 136 of 2014) [2023] UGHCCD 371 (31 March 2023)

The High Court found the plaintiff was unlawfully arrested, detained, and battered by the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, but dismissed the claim against the Attorney General.

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Illegal Detention
  • Battery
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Damages
  • Joint And Several Liability
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] UGHC 357

Oting v B.O.G Adwari S.S.S

Oting v B.O.G Adwari S.S.S (Civil Appeal 8 of 2017) [2023] UGHC 357 (21 February 2023)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against an order setting aside an ex parte judgment, holding that service was not effectively brought to the respondent’s attention.

  • Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment
  • Service Of Summons
  • Malicious Prosecution
  • Unlawful Arrest
  • False Imprisonment
  • Setting-aside-ex-parte-judgment
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2022] UGHCCD 245

Bandonda V Captain Investments Ltd and Another

Bandonda V Captain Investments Ltd and Another (Civil Suit No. 493 of 2018) [2022] UGHCCD 245 (5 December 2022)

The court found that the Plaintiff's arrest and detention were unlawful as there was no reasonable suspicion of a criminal offence; the dispute was purely civil and commercial. The police, acting on the instigation of the 1st Defendant, effected an arrest and detention in violation of Article 23(1)(c) of the Constitution and Section 23(1) of the Police Act. The Plaintiff was detained beyond the constitutionally mandated 48 hours without being charged or released on bond, further violating his rights. Both Defendants were held vicariously liable for the actions of their officers and agents, as…

  • False Imprisonment
  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Compensation For Rights Violation
  • Police Misconduct
  • Remedies For Constitutional Breach
Read case analysis
Tort Law [2022] UGHCCD 115

Twinomugisha v Attorney General and 2 Others

Twinomugisha v Attorney General and 2 Others (Civil Suit No. 175 of 2017) [2022] UGHCCD 115 (19 July 2022)

The court found that the Plaintiff's arrest and detention were unlawful as they violated constitutional safeguards: he was detained in unauthorized places, not informed of reasons for arrest, denied access to legal counsel and medical care, and not brought before a court within 48 hours. The prosecution for desertion was malicious, as the Plaintiff was on officially sanctioned study leave, with his supervisors' knowledge and approval, and there was no reasonable or probable cause for the charge. The 2nd and 3rd Defendants, as government agents, acted with improper motives and in reckless disr…

  • Malicious Prosecution
  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Vicarious Liability
  • General Damages
  • Exemplary Damages
Read case analysis
Tort Law [2020] UGHCCD 65

Mukasa-Balikuddembe v Centenary Rural Development Bank Ltd & Another

Mukasa-Balikuddembe v Centenary Rural Development Bank Ltd & Another (CIVIL SUIT NO. 278 OF 2014) [2020] UGHCCD 65 (30 April 2020)

The court found that the plaintiff's constitutional right to liberty was violated when he was detained for more than 48 hours without being produced in court, contrary to Article 23(4) of the Constitution. The 2nd defendant (Attorney General) was held liable for false imprisonment as its agents detained the plaintiff beyond the lawful period. The 1st defendant's role was limited to making a complaint to police and did not amount to agency or direct liability for the detention. The court awarded general damages for the unlawful detention and continued reporting to police, as well as punitive d…

  • False Imprisonment
  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Damages
  • Vicarious Liability
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] UGHCCD 231

Mwesigwa v Attorney General & Another

Mwesigwa v Attorney General & Another (CIVIL SUIT NO. 112 OF 2016) [2019] UGHCCD 231 (20 December 2019)

The High Court held that the plaintiff’s arrest and detention were lawful, found no unlawful retention of vehicle documents, and dismissed his claims.

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Detention
  • Ownership Of Property
  • Damages
  • Proxy Purchase
  • Unlawful-arrest
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.