Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page: 2 court collections
Last checked: 18 Sep 2026, 04:12 UTC

Results update automatically as you type.

Judge

Topic

Legal area

Court

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters

25 Oct 2024

Commercial And Corporate [2024] UGCommC 321

Senono v Uganda Revenue Authority

Senono v Uganda Revenue Authority (Miscellaneous Cause 52 of 2024) [2024] UGCommC 321 (25 October 2024)

Court: Commercial Court of Uganda
Case number: Miscellaneous Cause 52 of 2024
Judge: Kahigi Asiimwe, J

The court found that the Applicant was not the legal owner of the goods in question because the bill of lading named Edison Group International as consignee and owner. The Applicant's reliance on a sales agreement was insufficient to effect a legal transfer of ownership under the East African Community Customs Management Act and Regulations, which require both parties to complete and sign Form C16 and obtain the Commissioner's permission for transfer of warehoused goods. No evidence was provided that this procedure was followed. Therefore, the Applicant had no legal standing to demand release…

Source excerpt

Proof Of Ownership
Bill Of Lading
Customs Clearance
Transfer Of Ownership
Warehoused Goods

Read case analysis

1 Jan 1953

Commercial And Corporate [1953] EACA 25

Shortt v Searle

Shortt v Searle (Civil Suit No. 107 of 1952) [1953] EACA 25 (1 January 1953)

Court: East African Court of Appeal
Case number: Civil Suit No. 107 of 1952
Judge: Connell J

By signing the transfer of ownership and authorizing the registration of the car in the hirer's name, the plaintiff held out to third parties that the hirer was the true owner. This representation enabled the hirer to sell the car to Rehman Bros., who in turn sold it to the defendant. The defendant, having relied on the registration and licence documents and having acted in good faith, acquired the car without knowledge of the hire-purchase arrangement. The court held that the plaintiff is estopped from asserting his title against the defendant, as his actions facilitated the hirer's apparent…