Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional Law [2020] ACHPR 1

Fadhl Al Mawla Husni Ahmed Ismail and 19 Others (represented by Freedom and Justice Party of Egypt) v Arab Republic of Egypt (Communication 670 of 2017)

Fadhl Al Mawla Husni Ahmed Ismail and 19 Others (represented by Freedom and Justice Party of Egypt) v Arab Republic of Egypt (Communication 670 of 2017) [2020] ACHPR 1 (9 September 2020)

The African Commission held that the communication was inadmissible because the Freedom and Justice Party lacked locus standi after dissolution.

  • Death Penalty
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Torture And Ill Treatment
  • Locus Standi
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Locus-standi
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2018] ACHPR 3

Ayatulla Alaa Hosny (represented by Dalia Lotfy) v Arab Republic of Egypt (Communication 603 of 2016)

Ayatulla Alaa Hosny (represented by Dalia Lotfy) v Arab Republic of Egypt (Communication 603 of 2016) [2018] ACHPR 3 (8 August 2018)

The African Commission granted withdrawal and closed a communication alleging arbitrary detention, torture, and unfair trial violations in Egypt.

  • Arbitrary Detention
  • Torture And Ill Treatment
  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Freedom Of Expression
  • Arbitrary-detention
  • Torture-and-ill-treatment
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2013] ACHPR 121

Ibrahim v Sudan (Communication 386/10)

Ibrahim v Sudan (Communication 386/10) [2013] ACHPR 121 (25 February 2013)

The Commission found that, although the applicant had constructively exhausted local remedies due to the unavailability, ineffectiveness, and inadequacy of judicial remedies in Sudan—caused by emergency decrees, statutory limitations, and immunity provisions—the communication was ultimately inadmissible because it was not submitted within a reasonable period as required by Article 56(6) of the African Charter. The Commission determined that the fifteen-month delay between the final domestic decision (Constitutional Court ruling communicated in January 2009) and the submission of the communica…

  • Admissibility Requirements
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • State Immunity
  • Statute Of Limitations
  • Torture And Ill Treatment
  • Access To Justice
Read case analysis
Human Rights [2002] ACHPR 35

Institute For Human Rights and Development v Democratic Republic of Congo (Communication 238 of 2001)

Institute For Human Rights and Development v Democratic Republic of Congo (Communication 238 of 2001) [2002] ACHPR 35 (16 May 2002)

The African Commission took note of the complainant’s withdrawal of a communication alleging unlawful detention and abuse, and closed the file without reaching the merits.

  • Arbitrary Detention
  • Torture And Ill Treatment
  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Freedom Of Expression
  • Freedom Of Association
  • Human-rights
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.