Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tax Law [2023] UGTAT 60

Rwimi EP Company Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application 132 of 2022)

Rwimi EP Company Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application 132 of 2022) [2023] UGTAT 60 (30 August 2023)

The Tribunal upheld a customs reclassification of relief valves used with a hydraulic turbine, finding they were separate valves under heading 84.81, not turbine parts.

  • Customs Valuation
  • Tariff Classification
  • Import Duties
  • Harmonized System Code
  • Hydropower Equipment
  • Administrative Review
Read case analysis
Tax Law [2023] UGTAT 12

Britania Allied Industries Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (TAT Application 103 of 2021)

Britania Allied Industries Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (TAT Application 103 of 2021) [2023] UGTAT 12 (29 May 2023)

The tribunal found that mango and guava fruit pulp do not fall under HS codes 2009.19.00 (orange juice) or 2009.79.00 (apple juice) but are properly classified under HS code 2009.89.00, which covers other juices of any single fruit or vegetable. The relevant duty remission scheme, as published in the EAC Gazette, only applies to specific HS codes and quantities, which did not include mango or guava pulp. The applicant's reliance on legitimate expectation was rejected because the respondent's communications and recommendations were limited to the HS codes listed, and statutory bodies cannot bi…

  • Customs Duty Remission
  • Tariff Classification
  • Legitimate Expectation
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Estoppel
  • Administrative Discretion
Read case analysis
Tax Law [2022] UGTAT 18

Elgon Hydro Siti Limited (Application No. TAT 125 of 2019)

Elgon Hydro Siti Limited (Application No. TAT 125 of 2019) [2022] UGTAT 18 (15 July 2022)

The Tribunal found that the ball valves imported by the applicant, while essential to the operation of the hydraulic turbine, are not integral parts of the turbine machinery itself but are separate mechanical appliances used to regulate water flow. The evidence, including the bill of lading and commercial invoice, showed that the ball valves were listed separately from turbine parts and were not included as spare parts of the turbine. The Tribunal relied on the definitions in the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary and the Dictionary of Mechanical Engineering, as well as the explanatory n…

  • Customs Valuation
  • Tariff Classification
  • Import Duties
  • Harmonized System Codes
  • Hydropower Equipment
  • Administrative Review
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.