Bakirana v Kiiza (HCT-01-LD-CV-CA 32 of 2023)
Bakirana v Kiiza (HCT-01-LD-CV-CA 32 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 132 (28 February 2025)
The appeal failed because the appellants' claim was based on a will that was neither pleaded nor produced in court, contrary to the requirements of the Evidence Act and established case law. Oral testimony about the will was inadmissible and insufficient to prove their claim to the suit land. The respondent's evidence was consistent with her pleadings and supported by documentary proof of letters of administration and inventory, establishing her entitlement as beneficiary of her late father's estate. The trial magistrate properly evaluated the evidence and did not rely on irregular evidence f…
Source excerpt
- Ownership Dispute
- Succession And Wills
- Evaluation Of Evidence
- Locus In Quo Proceedings