Bukenya v Regina
Bukenya v Regina (Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1952) [1952] EACA 235 (1 January 1952)
The Court held that while the High Court was legally empowered to substitute a conviction for receiving stolen property under section 188 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the facts did not support such a conviction. The appellant, though present and acting as a transporter, did not acquire possession or control over the stolen property; the exclusive possession remained with the thieves. There was no evidence of guilty knowledge or joint possession, and mere control of the vehicle did not equate to possession of the stolen goods. Therefore, the conviction for receiving could not be sustain…
Source excerpt
- Storebreaking
- Receiving Stolen Property
- Conviction Substitution
- Mens Rea
- Accessory After The Fact