Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Attorney General & Another v Kiggala & 4 Others (Miscellaneous Application 121 of 2024) [2025] UGHCCD 40 (26 February 2025)
The High Court granted a 12-month stay of execution pending appeal in a land dispute, finding the applicants had not shown strong prejudice but that limited suspension was justified.
Adong v Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (Civil Suit 93 of 2023) [2025] UGHCCD 25 (14 February 2025)
The High Court held that UETCL violated the plaintiff’s property rights by transmitting power lines over her land without prior lawful acquisition or compensation.
CRJE (East Africa) Limited v National Council for Higher Education (Application 27 of 2024) [2024] UGPPDPAAT 30 (20 June 2024)
The Tribunal found that the Contracts Committee of the Respondent unlawfully convened itself and revoked the Notice of Best Evaluated Bidder without a proper request from the Procurement and Disposal Unit, contrary to the requirements of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act and its Regulations. The Tribunal further held that the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority acted outside its statutory mandate by conducting an investigation not grounded in an ongoing audit as required by section 7(j) of the Act. The recommendations of the Authority were advisor…
Source excerpt
Uganda National Bureau of Standards V Ren Publishers Limited & Another (MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 635 OF 2019) [2019] UGHCCD 214 (31 October 2019)
The High Court discharged an interim measure of protection in an arbitration matter after finding the underlying MOU had expired and public interest favored relief.
Friecca Pharmacy Ltd v National Drug Authority & 2 Others (Civil Suit 731 of 2017) [2018] UGCommC 85 (30 July 2018)
The Plaintiff's suit is speculative and premature, as there has been no violation of its alleged right to operate a pharmacy free from competition within a 200 meter radius. The Plaintiff anticipates a possible future decision by the National Drug Authority (NDA) but no relocation approval has been granted to the 2nd and 3rd Defendants. The pleadings do not establish the three essential requirements of a cause of action: enjoyment of a right, violation of that right, and liability of the Defendant. The claim of unfair competition is unsupported by pleaded facts and not grounded in any enforce…
Source excerpt
