Uganda Case Law

Dual Trust (U) Ltd v Attorney General

Dual Trust (U) Ltd v Attorney General (Civil Suit No. 131 of 2019) [2025] UGHCCD 89 (10 June 2025)

Court

HC: Civil Division (Uganda)

Case number

Civil Suit No. 131 of 2019

Judge

Boniface Wamala, J

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to immediate possession of the maize, as the purported seller, Emma Kasisi, had no valid title and could not pass property to the plaintiff. The true owner, Oree Tom, was identified through police investigation, and the police lawfully seized and returned the maize to him on the ODPP's directive. The principle of nemo dat quod non habet applied, precluding the plaintiff from acquiring better title than the seller possessed. The tort of detinue was not established, as the plaintiff was not entitled to demand restoration of the maiz…

Source excerpt

• Detinue
• Trespass To Chattels
• Statute Of Limitation
• Vicarious Liability
• Conversion
• Burden Of Proof

Bamwenegwire v Kabale District Local Government (Labour Dispute Reference 6 of 2024)

Bamwenegwire v Kabale District Local Government (Labour Dispute Reference 6 of 2024) [2025] UGIC 7 (23 January 2025)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Reference 6 of 2024

Judges

Wabwire Musana, J, Namara, Panel Member, Nabirye, Matovu

The Industrial Court held that the claim was time-barred under Section 3(2) of the Civil Procedure and Limitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Cap. 283, which requires actions against government entities to be filed within three years of the cause of action. The Claimant was dismissed in December 2002, and the claim was filed in November 2024, exceeding the statutory period by over two decades. The Court found that the Labour Officer's discretion to extend time does not override the statutory limitation period for government actions. Previous litigation attempts did not suspend or reset the…

Source excerpt

• Unfair Dismissal
• Statute Of Limitation
• Res Judicata
• Jurisdiction Of Magistrates
• Extension Of Time
• Labour Officer Discretion

Nakyomu and 4 Others v Namukwaya and 2 Others

Nakyomu and 4 Others v Namukwaya and 2 Others (Civil Suit 1036 of 2020) [2024] UGHCLD 254 (25 October 2024)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Civil Suit 1036 of 2020

Judges

Byaruhanga immaculate, j

The High Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove a gift inter vivos or fraud over the suit land, dismissed the suit, upheld the 2nd defendant’s title, and vacated the caveat.

• Ownership Disputes
• Fraudulent Transfer
• Estate Beneficiaries
• Statute Of Limitation
• Land-ownership-dispute
• Gift-inter-vivos

Mugema v Wakiso District Local Government (Labour Dispute Reference 38 of 2023)

Mugema v Wakiso District Local Government (Labour Dispute Reference 38 of 2023) [2024] UGIC 46 (11 October 2024)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Reference 38 of 2023

Judges

Wabwire Musana, J, Namara, Panel Member, Nabirye, Matovu

The court determined that the claimant's action was founded on breach of employment contract, not tort. The applicable limitation law is Section 3(2) of the Civil Procedure and Limitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Cap. 283, which prescribes a three-year limitation period for contractual claims against government or local authorities. The claimant was removed from the payroll in September 2005 and reinstated in March 2006; thus, the cause of action accrued at the latest in 2006. The claim was filed in 2021, well outside the statutory period. The court rejected the claimant's argument that…

Source excerpt

• Statute Of Limitation
• Employment Contracts
• Salary Arrears
• Continuing Tort
• Public Service Employment

Nyanzi (As Administratrix of the estate of the late Semei Nyanzi) v Attorney General of Uganda

Nyanzi (As Administratrix of the estate of the late Semei Nyanzi) v Attorney General of Uganda (Civil Suit No. 524 of 2015) [2022] UGHCLD 166 (2 September 2022)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Civil Suit No. 524 of 2015

Judge

Namanya, Ag. J

The High Court admitted a late defence filed two days out of time, but held the land compensation and recovery suit was time barred and dismissed it.

• Statute Of Limitation
• Compulsory Acquisition
• Recovery Of Land
• Government Proceedings
• Dismissal Of Suit
• Statute-of-limitation

Wanumi and Anor v Nzirejje and 2 Others

Wanumi and Anor v Nzirejje and 2 Others (Civil Suit No. 574 of 2020) [2021] UGHCLD 27 (30 March 2021)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Civil Suit No. 574 of 2020

Judge

Nkonge, J

The High Court rejected a land plaint as time-barred, res judicata, and lacking a reasonable cause of action, and awarded costs to the applicants.

• Cause Of Action
• Statute Of Limitation
• Res Judicata
• Frivolous And Vexatious Suits
• Leasehold Title
• Execution Of Decree

National Bank of Commerce Limited (in liquidation) v Twinobusingye and Others (Labour Dispute Appeal No. 9 of 2020)

National Bank of Commerce Limited (in liquidation) v Twinobusingye and Others (Labour Dispute Appeal No. 9 of 2020) [2021] UGIC 70 (10 March 2021)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Appeal No. 9 of 2020

Judge

Mavunwa, Panel Member, Ruhinda-Ntengye, J, Tumusiime-Mugisha, J, Bwire, Panel Member, Nyacho, Panel Member

The Industrial Court allowed an appeal by National Bank of Commerce (in liquidation) and set aside a labour officer’s award, holding the claim was filed out of time under the Limitation Act.

• Statute Of Limitation
• Termination Of Employment
• Labour Officer Discretion
• Contractual Claims
• Representative Actions
• Employment-law

Bukenya v DFCU Bank Ltd & Anor

Bukenya v DFCU Bank Ltd & Anor (Civil Suit No. 267 of 2015) [2016] UGCommC 50 (10 June 2016)

Court

Commercial Court of Uganda

Case number

Civil Suit No. 267 of 2015

The court held that the plaintiff's cause of action for breach of contract and for compensation for deprivation of property is barred by the statute of limitation, as these claims were brought more than six years after the cause of action arose. The mortgage agreement, though not executed in the prescribed statutory form, remains a binding contract between the parties, and any alleged illegality in its execution cannot be relied upon by the plaintiff to found a cause of action. However, the claim for cancellation of the second defendant's title and reinstatement of the plaintiff as registered…

Source excerpt

• Statute Of Limitation
• Mortgage Agreements
• Fraudulent Transfer Of Property
• Cancellation Of Title
• Recovery Of Land

National outdoor advertisement contractors association & 7 ors v Uganda national roads

National outdoor advertisement contractors association & 7 ors v Uganda national roads (Miscellaneous Application No. 36 of 2015) [2015] UGHCCD 93 (3 September 2015)

Court

HC: Civil Division (Uganda)

Case number

Miscellaneous Application No. 36 of 2015

The High Court dismissed an application to amend a judicial review motion, holding that the proposed amendment would add new parties and new causes of action out of time.

• Judicial Review Amendment
• Addition Of Parties
• Locus Standi
• Statute Of Limitation
• Judicial-review
• Amendment-of-pleadings