Nalubega and Another v Jackson Kakayira
Nalubega and Another v Jackson Kakayira (Civil Appeal No. 40 of 2004) [2004] UGCA 49 (26 November 2004)
The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was correct in finding that the respondent and his siblings were bona fide occupants of the land, and that the caveats protecting their interest were improperly removed without proper notice or legal compliance. The sale agreement, though unstamped, was properly admitted in evidence under section 43 of the Stamp Act, and its admission could not be challenged at the appellate stage. The first appellant, as administrator, acted fraudulently by causing the removal of caveats and selling the land without satisfying the estate's interest. The second ap…
Source excerpt
- Bona Fide Occupancy
- Removal Of Caveats
- Fraud In Land Transactions
- Succession And Administration Of Estates
- Registration Of Titles
- Stamp Duty On Instruments