Battaka v Uganda Investment Authority & Anor
Battaka v Uganda Investment Authority & Anor (Civil Suit No: 38 of 2011) [2018] UGHCLD 46 (29 May 2018)
The High Court held that the plaintiff was a trespasser on the disputed land and dismissed her compensation claim with costs.
- Trespass To Land
- Compensation For Developments
- Squatters Rights
- Limitation Periods
- Ownership Disputes
- Trespass-to-land