Ssenkungu Akim v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2023) [2025] UGSC 22 (4 July 2025)
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2023
Judge
Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza, JSC, Tuhaise, JSC, Mike Chibita, JSC, Stephen Musota, JSC, Madrama , JSC
The Supreme Court of Uganda dismissed a criminal appeal, holding that issues not raised before the Court of Appeal could not be entertained and that the sentence challenge was barred.
Kiiza Jovan v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 305 of 2020) [2025] UGCA 178 (30 May 2025)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 305 of 2020
Judge
Dr. F. Zeija, DCJ, Gashirabake, JA, K.K. Katunguka, JJA/JCC
The Court of Appeal upheld a 35-year sentence for murder, finding the trial court had considered mitigation and that the sentence was not manifestly excessive.
Ssebulime Farook v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 255 of 2016) [2025] UGCA 167 (30 May 2025)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal 255 of 2016
Judge
Obura, JA, Gashirabake, JA, Luswata, JA
The Court of Appeal upheld a murder conviction and 40-year sentence, finding circumstantial evidence and the last seen doctrine sufficient, with no material contradictions.
Court of Appeal upheld a rape conviction and 20 years 2 months’ imprisonment, finding the evidence coherent, identification reliable, and the sentence not excessive.
Sebaduka Umar v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No.O227 of 2016) [2025] UGCA 137 (14 May 2025)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal No.O227 of 2016
Judge
Kiryabwire, JA, Muzamiru, JA, Kihika, JA /JCC
The Court of Appeal upheld a sentence appeal, finding the trial court failed to deduct 1 year and 3 months spent on remand from a plea-bargained 13-year sentence.
Nyecko Charles Alias Obama v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 0656 of 2015) [2025] UGCA 134 (9 May 2025)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 0656 of 2015
Judge
Kiryabwire, JA, Luswata, JA, Mulyagonja, JA
The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge erred by failing to deduct the pre-trial remand period from the sentence, as required by Article 23(8) of the Constitution. Both parties agreed that the sentence was illegal. The court found that the omission constituted a breach of a mandatory constitutional provision and that the appellate court was empowered to remedy the illegality. Accordingly, the court deducted the 1 year and 7 months spent on remand from the original 18-year sentence, resulting in a revised sentence of 16 years and 5 months imprisonment from the date of sentencing. The app…
Cherop v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 244 of 2024) [2025] UGCA 98 (10 April 2025)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal 244 of 2024
Judge
Mulyagonja, JA, Tibulya, JA/JCC, Kazibwe, JA
Second appeal in a grievous harm conviction. The Court upheld findings on conviction, but reduced the sentence by 21 days after finding the remand period was ignored.