Kalanzi v Absa Bank Uganda Limited
Kalanzi v Absa Bank Uganda Limited (Miscellaneous Application 1715 of 2024) [2025] UGCommC 36 (13 March 2025)
The court found that while negative orders are not capable of being stayed, the impugned orders included positive orders for payment of money, which can be stayed. The applicant had pending suits and there was an imminent threat of execution, satisfying the requirements of Order 22 Rule 26 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Although the applicant did not demonstrate that the respondent would be unable to refund the money if the review succeeded, the court recognized the applicant's contention of not being heard and the existence of triable issues in the review application. The balance of convenien…
Source excerpt
- Stay Of Execution
- Security For Judgment Debt
- Review Of Judgment
- Default Judgment
- Balance Of Convenience